Lyubomirsky Sonja, Sousa Lorie, Dickerhoof Rene
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;90(4):692-708. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.692.
Three studies considered the consequences of writing, talking, and thinking about significant events. In Studies 1 and 2, students wrote, talked into a tape recorder, or thought privately about their worst (N = 96) or happiest experience (N = 111) for 15 min each during 3 consecutive days. In Study 3 (N = 112), students wrote or thought about their happiest day; half systematically analyzed, and half repetitively replayed this day. Well-being and health measures were administered before each study's manipulation and 4 weeks after. As predicted, in Study 1, participants who processed a negative experience through writing or talking reported improved life satisfaction and enhanced mental and physical health relative to those who thought about it. The reverse effect for life satisfaction was observed in Study 2, which focused on positive experiences. Study 3 examined possible mechanisms underlying these effects. Students who wrote about their happiest moments--especially when analyzing them--experienced reduced well-being and physical health relative to those who replayed these moments. Results are discussed in light of current understanding of the effects of processing life events.
三项研究探讨了书写、谈论和思考重大事件的后果。在研究1和研究2中,学生们连续三天每天花15分钟书写、对着录音机讲述或私下思考他们最糟糕的经历(N = 96)或最快乐的经历(N = 111)。在研究3(N = 112)中,学生们书写或思考他们最快乐的一天;其中一半进行系统分析,另一半反复回想这一天。在每项研究的操作前和操作后4周进行幸福感和健康指标的测量。正如预期的那样,在研究1中,通过书写或谈论来处理负面经历的参与者相对于那些只是思考负面经历的参与者,报告了更高的生活满意度以及更好的身心健康状况。在聚焦于积极经历的研究2中,观察到了与生活满意度相反的效果。研究3考察了这些效应背后可能的机制。与那些反复回想最快乐时刻的学生相比,书写这些时刻——尤其是在分析这些时刻时——的学生体验到了幸福感降低和身体健康变差。结合当前对处理生活事件效应的理解对研究结果进行了讨论。