Suppr超能文献

联用皮质类固醇鼻喷雾剂和抗组胺药(口服或局部喷雾剂)用于过敏性鼻炎的症状管理。

Concomitant corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine (oral or local spray) for the symptomatic management of allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Feng Shaoyan, Fan Yunping, Liang Zibin, Ma Renqiang, Cao Wanwei

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 52, Meihua East Road, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai, 519020, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;273(11):3477-3486. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3832-1. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the symptomatic management of corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine (oral or local spray) with that of either therapy given alone, or placebo in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). The PRISMA guidelines for meta-analysis reporting were followed. Total nasal symptom scores and individual nasal symptom scores were pooled after assessing heterogeneity among studies. The pooled estimates were expressed as weighted mean differences (WMD) between treatments. A total of ten studies fulfilled eligibility. Three trials studied the combination therapy of corticosteroid nasal spray and oral antihistamine. Pooled results of two trials failed to show significant difference on total nasal symptoms between combination therapy and intranasal corticosteroid alone (WMD = -0.20, 95 % CI -0.38 to -0.01, P = 0.04). The qualitative analysis showed that combination therapy has greater efficacy than oral antihistamines alone or placebo in improving symptoms. Seven trials investigated corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine nasal spray. The cumulative meta-analysis of six RCTs revealed that combination therapy was superior to solo intranasal corticosteroid (WMD = -1.16, 95 % CI -1.49 to -0.83, P < 0.00001), solo intranasal antihistamine (WMD = -1.73, 95 % CI -2.08 to -1.38, P < 0.00001), and placebo (WMD = -2.81, 95 % CI -3.16 to -2.47, P < 0.00001) in improving total nasal symptom scores. Intranasal corticosteroid plus oral antihistamine have similar efficacy to intranasal corticosteroid alone, greater efficacy than oral antihistamines alone or placebo in reducing nasal symptoms for AR patients. Intranasal corticosteroid plus intranasal antihistamine are significantly superior to either therapy given alone, or placebo.

摘要

本研究旨在对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较皮质类固醇鼻喷雾剂加抗组胺药(口服或局部喷雾剂)与单独使用任一疗法或安慰剂对过敏性鼻炎(AR)患者进行症状管理的效果。遵循了荟萃分析报告的PRISMA指南。在评估研究间的异质性后,汇总了总鼻症状评分和个体鼻症状评分。汇总估计值表示为治疗之间的加权平均差(WMD)。共有十项研究符合纳入标准。三项试验研究了皮质类固醇鼻喷雾剂与口服抗组胺药的联合疗法。两项试验的汇总结果未能显示联合疗法与单独使用鼻内皮质类固醇在总鼻症状上有显著差异(WMD = -0.20,95%CI -0.38至-0.01,P = 0.04)。定性分析表明,联合疗法在改善症状方面比单独使用口服抗组胺药或安慰剂具有更大的疗效。七项试验研究了皮质类固醇鼻喷雾剂加抗组胺鼻喷雾剂。六项RCT的累积荟萃分析表明,联合疗法在改善总鼻症状评分方面优于单独使用鼻内皮质类固醇(WMD = -1.16,95%CI -1.49至-0.83,P < 0.00001)、单独使用鼻内抗组胺药(WMD = -1.73,95%CI -2.08至-1.38,P < 0.00001)和安慰剂(WMD = -2.81,95%CI -3.16至-2.47,P < 0.00001)。鼻内皮质类固醇加口服抗组胺药与单独使用鼻内皮质类固醇具有相似的疗效,在减轻AR患者的鼻症状方面比单独使用口服抗组胺药或安慰剂具有更大的疗效。鼻内皮质类固醇加鼻内抗组胺药明显优于单独使用任一疗法或安慰剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验