Whelan Anne Marie, Jurgens Tannis M, Bowles Susan K
College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 May;40(5):836-49. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G226. Epub 2006 May 2.
Consumers are increasingly looking to natural health products to manage specific diseases such as osteoporosis. As a result, healthcare providers need evidence-based information on which to base recommendations regarding use and efficacy.
To identify natural health products (NHPs, ie, dietary supplements) advocated for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and systematically review the evidence from randomized controlled trials for the effect of NHPs on bone mineral density (BMD)/fracture rate in women.
MEDLINE, Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, and the Internet were initially searched to identify NHPs advocated for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. For NHPs having evidence to support their claim, the aforementioned sources, along with International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, the Cochrane Library, the International Bibliographic Information on Dietary Supplements, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health, and HerbMed, were searched to locate randomized controlled trials published in English between 1966 and October 2004. Bibliographies of identified articles were also searched. Randomized controlled trials were selected if they evaluated the use of a single NHP in women, using BMD/fracture rate as the outcome measure. NHPs were excluded from further evaluation if a review had already been published. Data were extracted using predetermined criteria and studies appraised using the Jadad scale. Forty-five NHPs were identified that the authors claimed to be beneficial in prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, with 15 having evidence to support their claim. Calcium; copper; evening primrose oil; fish oils; fluoride; magnesium; manganese; strontium; vitamin D; and black, green, and oolong tea did not meet study criteria.
Results from randomized controlled trials evaluating dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), phytoestrogens, and vitamin K2 (menaquinone or menatetrenone) were promising; however, study limitations suggest the need for confirmatory evidence.
Although no definitive conclusions can be drawn, the relative safety of phytoestrogens, DHEA, and vitamin K2 at the studied doses, as well as preliminary positive results from randomized controlled trials, provides some initial support for the use of these NHPs in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in women.
消费者越来越倾向于使用天然健康产品来管理特定疾病,如骨质疏松症。因此,医疗保健提供者需要基于证据的信息,以便为产品的使用和功效提供建议。
确定主张用于预防和治疗骨质疏松症的天然健康产品(即膳食补充剂),并系统回顾随机对照试验中关于天然健康产品对女性骨矿物质密度(BMD)/骨折率影响的证据。
最初检索了MEDLINE、天然药物综合数据库和互联网,以确定主张用于预防和治疗骨质疏松症的天然健康产品。对于有证据支持其宣称的天然健康产品,检索上述来源以及国际药学文摘、Cochrane图书馆、国际膳食补充剂文献信息、护理及相关健康累积索引和HerbMed,以查找1966年至2004年10月期间以英文发表的随机对照试验。还检索了已识别文章的参考文献。如果随机对照试验评估了单一天然健康产品在女性中的使用情况,并将BMD/骨折率作为结局指标,则选择这些试验。如果已经发表了综述,则将该天然健康产品排除在进一步评估之外。使用预定标准提取数据,并使用Jadad量表对研究进行评估。确定了45种作者声称对预防和治疗骨质疏松症有益的天然健康产品,其中15种有证据支持其宣称。钙、铜、月见草油、鱼油、氟化物、镁、锰、锶、维生素D以及红茶、绿茶和乌龙茶不符合研究标准。
评估脱氢表雄酮(DHEA)、植物雌激素和维生素K2(甲萘醌或四烯甲萘醌)的随机对照试验结果令人鼓舞;然而,研究局限性表明需要确证性证据。
尽管无法得出明确结论,但在所研究剂量下植物雌激素、DHEA和维生素K2的相对安全性,以及随机对照试验的初步阳性结果,为这些天然健康产品用于预防和治疗女性骨质疏松症提供了一些初步支持。