Green Jonathan
University of Manchester, UK.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 May;47(5):425-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01516.x.
There has been relatively little research into therapeutic alliance in child and adolescent mental health and virtually no incorporation of alliance measures as a variable in treatment trials in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS).
A selective literature review on studies in therapeutic alliance in adulthood and childhood along with a theoretical formulation of possible mechanisms of alliance.
Therapeutic alliance is reliably measurable both by observation and questionnaire methods at all points in the treatment cycle. In both adult and child studies it shows a consistent, albeit modest, association with treatment outcome. In specific adult studies it has shown a high predictive validity in relation to outcome compared to other variables. In child studies alliance is particularly salient in externalising disorder and predicts outcome of inpatient treatment. Child alliance and parental alliance are independent factors. Theoretical models of alliance outlined in this paper suggest testable hypotheses regarding predictors for positive and negative alliance.
Therapeutic alliance in CAMHS is measurable and worth measuring. It is likely to be an important variable for treatment outcome studies and should be included in future trial designs.
针对儿童和青少年心理健康方面的治疗联盟研究相对较少,在儿童和青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS)的治疗试验中,几乎没有将联盟测量作为一个变量纳入其中。
对成年期和儿童期治疗联盟的研究进行选择性文献综述,并对联盟可能的机制进行理论阐述。
在治疗周期的所有阶段,治疗联盟均可通过观察和问卷调查方法可靠地进行测量。在成人和儿童研究中,它均与治疗结果呈现出一致的关联,尽管这种关联较为适度。在特定的成人研究中,与其他变量相比,它在预测结果方面显示出较高的效度。在儿童研究中,联盟在外化障碍中尤为突出,并能预测住院治疗的结果。儿童联盟和父母联盟是独立的因素。本文概述的联盟理论模型提出了关于积极和消极联盟预测因素的可检验假设。
CAMHS中的治疗联盟是可测量的,且值得测量。它很可能是治疗结果研究的一个重要变量,应纳入未来的试验设计中。