• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

天然草地和人造草皮上的鞋内足部负荷模式比较。

Comparison of in-shoe foot loading patterns on natural grass and synthetic turf.

作者信息

Ford Kevin R, Manson Neil A, Evans Blake J, Myer Gregory D, Gwin Richelle C, Heidt Robert S, Hewett Timothy E

机构信息

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center, Human Performance Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 2006 Dec;9(6):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.019. Epub 2006 May 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.019
PMID:16672191
Abstract

Synthetic playing surfaces with rubber or sand infill are now used on many athletic fields such as soccer, football and rugby. Although these surfaces may come closer to the mechanical characteristics of a true grass playing surface than the older turf designs, their potential effects on lower extremity biomechanics and related injury rates necessitate further study. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two surfaces (natural grass versus turf) on in-shoe foot loading patterns during cutting. Seventeen male football players were tested on a slalom course. An in-shoe pressure distribution measurement insole was used in the right shoe (14 stud, molded cleat) of each athlete. Individual cutting steps were extracted from each slalom trial and peak pressure and relative load calculated in nine distinct plantar regions of the foot. The turf condition had significantly higher peak pressures within the central forefoot (turf: 646.6+/-172.6 kPa, grass: 533.3+/-143.4 kPa, P=0.017) and lesser toes (turf: 429.3+/-200.9 kPa, grass: 348.1+/-119.0 kPa, P=0.043) compared to grass. In contrast, the relative load within the medial forefoot (turf: 27.2+/-5.3%, grass: 30.2+/-6.6%, P=0.031) and lateral midfoot (turf: 3.4+/-1.8%, grass: 4.1+/-2.3%, P=0.029) were higher during the grass condition. No differences between the grass and turf were found in maximal effort sprint times performed prior to the testing trials. This study demonstrates that playing surface significantly affects plantar loading during sport related activities. Further epidemiological investigation is warranted to determine the effects of playing surfaces on sport specific injury mechanisms.

摘要

现在,许多运动场地,如足球、英式橄榄球和美式橄榄球场地,都使用填充了橡胶或沙子的合成草皮。尽管与早期的草皮设计相比,这些场地的机械特性可能更接近天然草皮场地,但它们对下肢生物力学和相关损伤发生率的潜在影响仍需进一步研究。本研究的目的是检查两种场地(天然草皮与人工草皮)对切入动作中鞋内足部负荷模式的影响。17名男性足球运动员在障碍滑雪赛道上进行了测试。在每位运动员的右鞋(14颗鞋钉、模压防滑钉)中使用了鞋内压力分布测量鞋垫。从每个障碍滑雪试验中提取单个切入步骤,并计算足部九个不同足底区域的峰值压力和相对负荷。与天然草皮相比,人工草皮场地在前脚掌中部(人工草皮:646.6±172.6千帕,天然草皮:533.3±143.4千帕,P=0.017)和小脚趾区域(人工草皮:429.3±200.9千帕,天然草皮:348.1±119.0千帕,P=0.043)的峰值压力明显更高。相比之下,在天然草皮场地条件下,前脚掌内侧(人工草皮:27.2±5.3%,天然草皮:30.2±6.6%,P=0.031)和中足外侧(人工草皮:3.4±1.8%,天然草皮:4.1±2.3%,P=0.029)的相对负荷更高。在测试试验之前进行的全力冲刺时间方面,天然草皮和人工草皮之间没有差异。本研究表明,运动场地在与运动相关的活动中会显著影响足底负荷。有必要进行进一步的流行病学调查,以确定运动场地对特定运动损伤机制的影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of in-shoe foot loading patterns on natural grass and synthetic turf.天然草地和人造草皮上的鞋内足部负荷模式比较。
J Sci Med Sport. 2006 Dec;9(6):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.019. Epub 2006 May 2.
2
Effects of turf and cleat footwear on plantar load distributions in adolescent American football players during resisted pushing.人造草皮场地和防滑钉鞋对青少年美式橄榄球运动员在抗阻推搡过程中足底负荷分布的影响。
Sports Biomech. 2018 Jun;17(2):227-237. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2016.1271448. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
3
Physiologic axial load, frictional resistance, and the football shoe-surface interface.生理轴向负荷、摩擦阻力与足球鞋-地面界面
Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Jul;24(7):551-6. doi: 10.1177/107110070302400705.
4
Comparison of plantar loading patterns on natural grass and artificial turf during various athletic activities.不同运动项目中天然草皮和人造草皮的足底压力分布比较。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2021 May;61(5):680-686. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.11342-8. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
5
A review of synthetic playing surfaces, the shoe-surface interface, and lower extremity injuries in athletes.合成运动场地表面、鞋-地界面与运动员下肢损伤的研究综述。
Phys Sportsmed. 2012 Nov;40(4):66-72. doi: 10.3810/psm.2012.11.1989.
6
In-shoe plantar pressure distribution during running on natural grass and asphalt in recreational runners.在自然草皮和沥青路面上跑步时,运动鞋内的足底压力分布情况。
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Jan;13(1):151-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
7
Torsional injuries of the lower limb: an analysis of the frictional torque between different types of football turf and the shoe outsole.下肢扭转损伤:不同类型足球草皮与鞋底外底间的摩擦力分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;46(15):1078-83. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-090938. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
8
Characteristic plantar pressure distribution patterns during soccer-specific movements.足球特定动作过程中的特征性足底压力分布模式。
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;32(1):140-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546503258932.
9
Football playing surface and shoe design affect rotational traction.足球比赛场地和鞋类设计会影响旋转牵引力。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):518-25. doi: 10.1177/0363546508328108. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
10
Attenuation of foot pressure during running on four different surfaces: asphalt, concrete, rubber, and natural grass.在四种不同表面(沥青、混凝土、橡胶和天然草皮)上跑步时足部压力的衰减。
J Sports Sci. 2012;30(14):1545-50. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.713975. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of different materials under the fencing piste on impact shock of the tibia during the fencing lunge on a concrete surface.在混凝土表面进行击剑弓步刺时,击剑剑道下方不同材料对胫骨撞击冲击的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 May 15;20(5):e0323557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323557. eCollection 2025.
2
First metatarsophalangeal joint: Embryology, anatomy and biomechanics.第一跖趾关节:胚胎学、解剖学与生物力学
World J Orthop. 2025 Apr 18;16(4):102506. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i4.102506.
3
Effect of Natural Turf, Artificial Turf, and Sand Surfaces on Sprint Performance. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
天然草皮、人造草皮和沙地表面对短跑成绩的影响。一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 17;17(24):9478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249478.
4
EFFECTS OF SURFACE ON TRIPLE HOP DISTANCE AND KINEMATICS.表面对三级跳远距离和运动学的影响。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Dec;15(6):920-927. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20200920.
5
Epidemiology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury on Natural Grass Versus Artificial Turf in Soccer: 10-Year Data From the National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System.足球运动中天然草坪与人工草皮上前交叉韧带损伤的流行病学:来自美国国家大学体育协会损伤监测系统的10年数据
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jul 22;8(7):2325967120934434. doi: 10.1177/2325967120934434. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
MODIFYING MIDSOLE STIFFNESS of BASKETBALL FOOTWEAR AFFECTS FOOT and ANKLE BIOMECHANICS.改变篮球鞋中底硬度会影响足部和踝关节生物力学。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;14(3):359-367. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20190359.
7
Incidence, Mechanisms, and Severity of Game-Related High School Football Injuries Across Artificial Turf Systems of Various Infill Weights.不同填充重量人工草皮系统下高中橄榄球运动相关损伤的发生率、机制及严重程度
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Mar 25;7(3):2325967119832878. doi: 10.1177/2325967119832878. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
Current Soccer Footwear, Its Role in Injuries and Potential for Improvement.当前的足球鞋:其在损伤中的作用及改进潜力
Sports Med Int Open. 2018 May 25;2(2):E52-E61. doi: 10.1055/a-0608-4229. eCollection 2018 Apr.
9
Is Plantar Loading Altered During Repeated Sprints on Artificial Turf in International Football Players?足球运动员在人造草皮上多次冲刺时足底负荷是否会改变?
J Sports Sci Med. 2018 Aug 14;17(3):359-365. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
Fifth metatarsal stress fracture in elite male football players: an on-field analysis of plantar loading.精英男性足球运动员第五跖骨应力性骨折:足底负荷的场上分析
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Jun 20;4(1):e000377. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000377. eCollection 2018.