Sanchez-Sanchez Javier, Martinez-Rodriguez Alejandro, Felipe Jose Luis, Hernandez-Martin Antonio, Ubago-Guisado Esther, Bangsbo Jens, Gallardo Leonor, Garcia-Unanue Jorge
School of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.
Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science Department, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 17;17(24):9478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249478.
The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of natural turf, artificial turf, and sand on sprint performance in different sports and to determine how the sport surface affects sprint performance. A systematic search was conducted in Pubmed, Web of Sciences, and SPORTDiscus databases. Out of 5644 studies, 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The studies were very heterogeneous, as they examined different structural characteristics or quality parameters. The studies on natural turf and sand showed significant improvements on sprint speed during training. On the other hand, the analysis of fatigue did not reveal significant differences in the deterioration of sprint speed on both natural and artificial turf. Significance was set at < 0.05. In conclusion, although lower performance in sprint was reported on sand, further studies are needed to explain the differences in sprint on natural and artificial turf.
本研究的目的是分析天然草皮、人造草皮和沙地对不同运动项目短跑成绩的影响，并确定运动场地如何影响短跑成绩。在PubMed、科学网和SPORTDiscus数据库中进行了系统检索。在5644项研究中，有11项研究被纳入荟萃分析。这些研究差异很大，因为它们考察了不同的结构特征或质量参数。关于天然草皮和沙地的研究表明，训练期间短跑速度有显著提高。另一方面，对疲劳的分析并未发现天然草皮和人造草皮上短跑速度下降存在显著差异。显著性设定为<0.05。总之，尽管沙地短跑成绩较低，但仍需要进一步研究来解释天然草皮和人造草皮上短跑的差异。
