• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AH Plus与Epiphany根管封闭剂理化性质的比较研究

A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus and Epiphany root canal sealants.

作者信息

Versiani M A, Carvalho-Junior J R, Padilha M I A F, Lacey S, Pascon E A, Sousa-Neto M D

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2006 Jun;39(6):464-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01105.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01105.x
PMID:16674741
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate setting time, solubility and disintegration, flow, film thickness, and dimensional change following setting in a dual-cured resin root canal sealer Epiphany compared with an epoxy-resin-based sealer AH Plus.

METHODOLOGY

The experiments were performed according to ANSI/ADA Specification 57 which tests the physicochemical properties of endodontic sealing materials. Five samples of each material were tested for each of the properties. In addition, deionized distilled water from the solubility test of Epiphany was submitted for analysis of the cations Fe, Ni, Ca, Mg, Zn, Na, and K in an atomic absorption spectrometer. Three samples were analysed.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences (P>0.05) in flow (AH Plus: 38.57 mm; Epiphany: 35.74 mm) and film thickness (AH Plus: 10.6 microm; Epiphany: 20.1 microm). The solubility (AH Plus: 0.21%; Epiphany: 3.41%) and dimensional alterations following setting (AH Plus: expansion of 1.3%; Epiphany: expansion of 8.1%) were statistically different (P<0.05). The setting times of both sealants were in accordance with ANSI/ADA requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

Setting time, flow, and film thickness tests for both cements conformed to ANSI/ADA standards. Dimensional alteration test for both cements were greater than values considered acceptable by ANSI/ADA. Epiphany values regarding solubility were also greater than values considered acceptable by ANSI/ADA.

摘要

目的

评估双固化树脂根管封闭剂Epiphany与环氧树脂类封闭剂AH Plus相比,其凝固时间、溶解性与崩解性、流动性、薄膜厚度以及凝固后的尺寸变化。

方法

实验依据ANSI/ADA规范57进行,该规范用于测试牙髓腔封闭材料的物理化学性质。每种材料取五个样本进行各项性能测试。此外,将Epiphany溶解性测试中的去离子蒸馏水提交至原子吸收光谱仪,分析其中的阳离子铁、镍、钙、镁、锌、钠和钾。分析三个样本。

结果

流动性(AH Plus:38.57毫米;Epiphany:35.74毫米)和薄膜厚度(AH Plus:10.6微米;Epiphany:20.1微米)方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。溶解性(AH Plus:0.21%;Epiphany:3.41%)以及凝固后的尺寸变化(AH Plus:膨胀1.3%;Epiphany:膨胀8.1%)存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。两种封闭剂的凝固时间均符合ANSI/ADA要求。

结论

两种封闭剂的凝固时间、流动性和薄膜厚度测试均符合ANSI/ADA标准。两种封闭剂的尺寸变化测试结果均大于ANSI/ADA认为可接受的值。Epiphany的溶解性数值也大于ANSI/ADA认为可接受的值。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus and Epiphany root canal sealants.AH Plus与Epiphany根管封闭剂理化性质的比较研究
Int Endod J. 2006 Jun;39(6):464-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01105.x.
2
Physicochemical properties of methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers.基于甲基丙烯酸树脂的根管封闭剂的理化性能。
J Endod. 2010 Sep;36(9):1531-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 Jul 4.
3
A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE root canal sealers.AH Plus、Epiphany和Epiphany SE根管封闭剂物理化学性质的比较研究。
Int Endod J. 2009 Sep;42(9):785-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01584.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
4
Changes in the surface of four calcium silicate-containing endodontic materials and an epoxy resin-based sealer after a solubility test.四种含硅酸钙的根管封闭材料和一种基于环氧树脂的根管封闭剂在溶解度测试后的表面变化。
Int Endod J. 2012 May;45(5):419-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01992.x. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
5
Solubility of Epiphany endodontic sealer prepared with resinous solvent.
J Endod. 2009 May;35(5):715-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.021.
6
Evaluation of physicochemical properties of four root canal sealers.四种根管封闭剂的理化性能评价。
Int Endod J. 2011 Feb;44(2):126-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01815.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
7
Influence of calcium hydroxide association on the physical properties of AH Plus.氢氧化钙联合对 AH Plus 物理性能的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Jun;36(6):1048-51. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
8
Evaluation of the physicochemical properties of silicone- and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.基于硅酮和环氧树脂的根管封闭剂的物理化学性质评估。
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug 21;31:e72. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0072.
9
Physical properties of AH Plus with chlorhexidine and cetrimide.含氯己定和西曲溴铵的AH Plus的物理性质。
J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1611-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
10
Experimental amine-epoxide sealer: a physicochemical study in comparison with AH Plus and EasySeal.实验性胺-环氧化物封闭剂:与AH Plus和EasySeal的物理化学研究对比
Int Endod J. 2015 Aug;48(8):747-56. doi: 10.1111/iej.12372. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the tubular penetration of two different types of nanoparticle root canal sealers over apically separated files: a scanning electron microscopic study (in vitro study).两种不同类型的纳米颗粒根管封闭剂在根尖分离锉上的根管渗透评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究(体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06263-0.
2
Assessing the influence of Katana™ Cleaner on the clinical performance of bulk-fill restorations in endodontically treated teeth: study protocol for a randomized clinical study.评估Katana™清洁剂对根管治疗后牙齿的大块充填修复体临床性能的影响:一项随机临床研究的研究方案。
Trials. 2025 May 7;26(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08790-1.
3
Comparative evaluation of physicochemical properties of various root canal sealers: An study.
各种根管封闭剂物理化学性质的比较评价:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Apr;28(4):325-330. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_866_24. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
4
Extrusion degree of a new low-viscosity, injectable, light-cured endodontic filling material: an in-situ study in a cadaveric close-to-mouth experimental model.一种新型低粘度、可注射、光固化根管充填材料的挤出程度:在尸体口腔附近实验模型中的原位研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Apr 20;29(5):254. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06337-x.
5
Evaluation of dimensional changes in EndoSeal mineral trioxide aggregate and AH Plus sealers using micro-computed tomography imaging.使用微计算机断层扫描成像评估EndoSeal三氧化物聚合体和AH Plus封闭剂的尺寸变化。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Jul 12;21:33. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparison of five different obturation approaches for resistance against fracture in root canal treated teeth.五种不同根管充填方法对根管治疗后牙齿抗折性的比较。
Bioinformation. 2024 Jun 30;20(6):625-629. doi: 10.6026/973206300200625. eCollection 2024.
7
Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Resin and Calcium Silicate Based Sealers Removal in Mandibular Molars Curved Canals.下颌磨牙弯曲根管中树脂类和硅酸钙类封闭剂去除的显微计算机断层扫描分析
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Jun;58(2):134-144. doi: 10.15644/asc58/2/3.
8
Evaluating the use of self-conditioning adhesive combined with dual curing resin cement as an endodontic sealer: An in vitro study.评估自粘结性粘结剂与双固化树脂水门汀联合用作根管封闭剂的效果:一项体外研究。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2023 Nov 18;10(1):2282523. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2023.2282523. eCollection 2023.
9
Comparative Evaluation of the Apical Sealability of AH Plus and RealSeal SE Using 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite with 17% EDTA and 10% Citric Acid as Irrigants-An Study.使用5.25%次氯酸钠与17%乙二胺四乙酸和10%柠檬酸作为冲洗剂对AH Plus和RealSeal SE根尖封闭性的比较评价——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Apr;16(Suppl 2):S1754-S1760. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1122_23. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
10
Evaluation of stress distributions of calcium silicate-based root canal sealer in bulk or with main core material: A finite element analysis study.基于硅酸钙的根管封闭剂整体或与主要核心材料的应力分布评估:有限元分析研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0299552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299552. eCollection 2024.