Nyboe Camilla, Funder Jonas A, Smerup Morten H, Nygaard Hans, Hasenkam J Michael
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Sygehus, Brendstrupgaardsvej, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Jun;29(6):1008-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.03.013. Epub 2006 May 3.
Mechanical heart valves can cause thromboembolic complications, possibly due to abnormal flow patterns that produce turbulence downstream of the valve. The objective of this study was to investigate whether three different bileaflet valve designs would exhibit clinically relevant differences in downstream turbulent stresses.
Three bileaflet mechanical heart valves (Medtronic Advantage), CarboMedics Orbis Universal and St. Jude Medical Standard) were implanted into 19 female 90 kg pigs. Blood velocity was measured during open chest conditions in the cross sectional area downstream of the valves with 10 MHz ultrasonic probes connected to a modified Alfred Pulsed Doppler equipment. As a measure of turbulence, Reynolds normal stress (RNS) was calculated at three different cardiac output ranges (3-4, 4.5-5.5, 6-7 L/min).
Data from 12 animals were obtained. RNS correlated with increasing cardiac outputs. The highest instantaneous RNS observed in these experiments was 47 N/m2, and the mean RNS taken spatially over the cross sectional area of the aorta during systole was between 3 N/m2 and 15 N/m2. In none of the cardiac output ranges RNS values exceeded the lower critical limit for erythrocyte or thrombocyte damage for any of the valve designs.
Reynolds normal stress values were below 100 N/m2 for all three valve designs and the difference in design was not reflected in generation of turbulence. Hence, it is unlikely that any of the valve designs causes flow induced damage to platelets or erythrocytes.
机械心脏瓣膜可引发血栓栓塞并发症,这可能是由于异常血流模式在瓣膜下游产生湍流所致。本研究的目的是调查三种不同的双叶瓣膜设计在下游湍流应力方面是否会表现出临床相关差异。
将三种双叶机械心脏瓣膜(美敦力Advantage、CarboMedics Orbis Universal和圣犹达医疗标准型)植入19头体重90公斤的雌性猪体内。在开胸状态下,使用连接到改良型阿尔弗雷德脉冲多普勒设备的10兆赫超声探头,测量瓣膜下游横截面积处的血流速度。作为湍流的一种度量,在三个不同的心输出量范围(3 - 4、4.5 - 5.5、6 - 7升/分钟)下计算雷诺法向应力(RNS)。
获得了12只动物的数据。RNS与心输出量增加相关。在这些实验中观察到的最高瞬时RNS为47牛/平方米,在收缩期主动脉横截面积上空间平均的RNS在3牛/平方米至15牛/平方米之间。在任何心输出量范围内,对于任何一种瓣膜设计,RNS值均未超过红细胞或血小板损伤的下限临界值。
对于所有三种瓣膜设计,雷诺法向应力值均低于100牛/平方米,并且设计差异未在湍流产生中体现出来。因此,任何一种瓣膜设计都不太可能导致因血流引起的血小板或红细胞损伤。