Berquist R K, Berquist W E, Esquivel C O, Cox K L, Wayman K I, Litt I F
Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Pediatr Transplant. 2006 May;10(3):304-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00451.x.
Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non-adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition-related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non-adherent behavior. Furthermore, non-adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post-transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12-21). Non-adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non-adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non-adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non-adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single-parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non-adherent and adherent patients. Non-adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: -5.5 to -.99, Student's t-test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non-adherence was also significantly associated with re-transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition-related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re-transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non-adherent patients suggests that non-adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non-adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being.
很少有研究调查青少年肝移植人群中与不坚持免疫抑制治疗相关的患病率、人口统计学变量及不良后果。我们的假设是,相当一部分青少年肝移植受者存在不坚持治疗方案的情况,并且可以确定某些人口统计学和与医疗状况相关的特征为不坚持治疗行为的潜在预测因素。此外,与坚持治疗的青少年患者亚组相比,不坚持治疗会导致该人群中发病率和死亡率更高。我们回顾了1987年至2002年期间97例患者的病历,这些患者在2002年12月时移植后至少存活了1年,并且在青少年时期(12 - 21岁)的任何时间都由儿科肝移植服务团队进行随访。不坚持治疗被定义为患者、家长或医疗服务提供者报告的不坚持治疗情况记录在患者的法定病历中。使用描述性统计来确定与不坚持免疫抑制治疗相关的患病率、人口统计学变量和不良结局。分类变量使用卡方检验或Fisher精确概率检验进行分析。采用不成对学生t检验分析移植时年龄这一连续变量。根据纳入标准,共有97例患者代表研究样本,其中37例受试者(38.1%)被定义为不坚持治疗,60例(61.8%)为坚持治疗。不坚持治疗的受试者更可能为女性、年龄较大(>18岁)且来自单亲家庭。不坚持治疗和坚持治疗的患者在免疫抑制方案方面无显著差异。不坚持治疗与较低的社会经济地位(SES)、移植时年龄较大(p<0.005,95%可信区间:-5.5至-0.99,学生t检验)以及晚期急性排斥发作(p<0.001)显著相关。通过Fisher精确检验,不坚持治疗还与再次移植以及慢性排斥导致的死亡显著相关(分别为p<0.006和p<0.05)。在青少年肝移植人群中,不坚持免疫抑制治疗是一个普遍存在的问题,与某些人口统计学和与医疗状况相关的风险因素以及更频繁的不良后果相关。不坚持治疗的患者中晚期急性排斥、死亡和因慢性排斥导致的再次移植发生率更高,这表明不坚持治疗与发病率和死亡率增加显著相关。有必要进一步调查以确定不坚持治疗风险最高的患者,从而设计出最有效的干预措施来提高患者的生存率和健康水平。