Heiberg M S, Rødevand E, Mikkelsen K, Kaufmann C, Didriksen A, Mowinckel P, Kvien T K
Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Box 23 Vinderen, N-0319 Oslo, Norway.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Oct;65(10):1379-83. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.051540. Epub 2006 May 5.
To compare the effectiveness of adalimumab monotherapy and adalimumab and methotrexate (MTX) combination therapy in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis.
Data from an ongoing longitudinal observational study in Norway were used to compare response to treatment with two different adalimumab regimens (monotherapy, n = 84; combination with MTX, n = 99). Patients were assessed with measures of disease activity, health status and utility scores. Within-group changes were analysed from baseline to follow-up at 3 and 6 months and the changes were compared between groups after adjustment for the propensity score. The groups were also compared for the proportions of patients achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response, Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 remission and treatment terminations.
The improvement from baseline was significant for all measures in the adalimumab and MTX group, but only for DAS28, joint counts, two Short-form Health Survey with 36 questions (SF-36) dimensions and patient's and investigator's global assessment in the monotherapy group. All between-group differences were numerically in favour of combination therapy and significant for C reactive protein, joint counts, DAS28, Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire, investigator's global assessment, four SF-36 dimensions and Short Form 6D at 6 months. More patients in the combination therapy group reached EULAR good response (p<0.001) and remission (p = 0.07). At 6 months, 80.8% of the patients in the combination therapy group and 59.5% in the monotherapy group remained on treatment (p = 0.002). More withdrawals in the monotherapy group were due to adverse events.
Our results were consistent across several categories of end points and suggest that adalimumab combined with MTX is effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated in daily clinical practice and is superior to adalimumab monotherapy.
比较阿达木单抗单药治疗与阿达木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗已确诊类风湿关节炎患者的疗效。
利用挪威一项正在进行的纵向观察性研究数据,比较两种不同阿达木单抗治疗方案(单药治疗,n = 84;联合MTX,n = 99)的治疗反应。采用疾病活动度、健康状况和效用评分对患者进行评估。分析从基线到3个月和6个月随访时的组内变化,并在调整倾向得分后比较组间变化。还比较了两组达到欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)良好反应、疾病活动评分(DAS)28缓解和治疗终止的患者比例。
阿达木单抗联合MTX组所有测量指标从基线的改善均显著,但单药治疗组仅DAS28、关节计数、36项简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)的两个维度以及患者和研究者的整体评估有显著改善。所有组间差异在数值上均有利于联合治疗,且在6个月时C反应蛋白、关节计数、DAS28、改良健康评估问卷、研究者整体评估、SF - 36的四个维度和简明健康6维度方面差异显著。联合治疗组更多患者达到EULAR良好反应(p<0.001)和缓解(p = 0.07)。6个月时,联合治疗组80.8%的患者和单药治疗组59.5%的患者仍在接受治疗(p = 0.002)。单药治疗组更多的停药是由于不良事件。
我们的结果在多个终点类别中一致,表明阿达木单抗联合MTX在日常临床实践中治疗类风湿关节炎患者有效,且优于阿达木单抗单药治疗。