• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂人道主义紧急情况:流行病学与应对模式综述

Complex humanitarian emergencies: a review of epidemiological and response models.

作者信息

Burkle F M

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences and Epidemiology, Asia-Pacific Center for Biosecurity, Disaster and Conflict Research John A. Burns School of Medicine University of Hawaii, USA.

出版信息

J Postgrad Med. 2006 Apr-Jun;52(2):110-5.

PMID:16679674
Abstract

Complex emergencies (CEs) have been the most common human-generated disaster of the past two decades. These internal conflicts and associated acts of genocide have been poorly understood and poorly managed. This article provides an epidemiological background and understanding of developing and developed countries, and chronic or smoldering countries' CEs, and explains in detail the prevailing models of response seen by the international community. Even though CEs are declining in number, they have become more complex and dangerous. The UN Charter reform is expected to address internal conflicts and genocide but may not provide a more effective and efficient means to respond.

摘要

复杂紧急情况(CEs)是过去二十年来最常见的人为灾难。这些内部冲突及相关的种族灭绝行为一直未得到充分理解和妥善处理。本文提供了关于发展中国家、发达国家以及长期处于冲突或动荡状态国家的复杂紧急情况的流行病学背景及认识,并详细解释了国际社会普遍采用的应对模式。尽管复杂紧急情况的数量在减少,但它们变得更加复杂和危险。预计联合国宪章改革将解决内部冲突和种族灭绝问题,但可能无法提供更有效和高效的应对手段。

相似文献

1
Complex humanitarian emergencies: a review of epidemiological and response models.复杂人道主义紧急情况:流行病学与应对模式综述
J Postgrad Med. 2006 Apr-Jun;52(2):110-5.
2
[Epidemiological surveillance during humanitarian emergencies].[人道主义紧急情况期间的流行病学监测]
Med Trop (Mars). 2002;62(4):391-5.
3
Complex, humanitarian emergencies: I. Concept and participants.复杂的人道主义紧急情况:一、概念与参与方。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1995 Jan-Mar;10(1):36-42. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00041649.
4
Normalising the crisis in Africa.使非洲危机常态化。
Disasters. 1998 Dec;22(4):328-38. doi: 10.1111/1467-7717.00096.
5
Emergency preparedness and humanitarian action: the research deficit. Eastern Mediterranean Region perspective.应急准备与人道主义行动:研究不足。东地中海区域视角。
East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12 Suppl 2:S54-63.
6
[Military Bioforce, example of governmental humanitarian action].[军事生物力量,政府人道主义行动示例]
Med Trop (Mars). 2002;62(4):386-90.
7
Cracking the humanitarian logistic coordination challenge: lessons from the urban search and rescue community.破解人道主义后勤协调难题:城市搜救领域的经验教训
Disasters. 2016 Apr;40(2):246-61. doi: 10.1111/disa.12139. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
8
Haiti earthquake 2010: an Italian humanitarian medical response.2010年海地地震:意大利的人道主义医疗救援行动
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010 Dec;4(4):267. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.43.
9
Humanitarian relief aid "versus" development: should they be so far apart?人道主义救援援助“与”发展:它们应该相隔如此之远吗?
Am J Disaster Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;4(2):73-5.
10
[Civilian-military coordination].[军民协调]
Med Trop (Mars). 2002;62(4):445-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a new approach for managing pandemics: Hybrid resilience and bowtie modelling.迈向管理大流行病的新方法:混合弹性与蝴蝶结模型
Saf Sci. 2021 Jul;139:105274. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105274. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
2
Syndemic effects in complex humanitarian emergencies: A framework for understanding political violence and improving multi-morbidity health outcomes.复杂人道主义紧急事件中的综合征效应:理解政治暴力和改善多重发病健康结局的框架。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Feb;295:113378. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113378. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
3
How Bad Is It? Usefulness of the "7eed Model" for Scoring Severity and Level of Need in Complex Emergencies.
情况有多糟?“需求模型”在复杂紧急情况中评估严重程度和需求水平的效用
PLoS Curr. 2016 Jun 28;8:ecurrents.dis.d59e0fa39887031e1c3763851a6e5c2a. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.d59e0fa39887031e1c3763851a6e5c2a.
4
Disaster Metrics: A Proposed Quantitative Assessment Tool in Complex Humanitarian Emergencies - The Public Health Impact Severity Scale (PHISS).灾害指标:复杂人道主义紧急情况下的一种拟定量评估工具——公共卫生影响严重程度量表(PHISS)
PLoS Curr. 2012 Aug 21;4:e4f7b4bab0d1a3. doi: 10.1371/4f7b4bab0d1a3.
5
Community-based assessment of human rights in a complex humanitarian emergency: the Emergency Assistance Teams-Burma and Cyclone Nargis.基于社区的复杂人道主义紧急情况下的人权评估:紧急援助队-缅甸和纳尔吉斯气旋。
Confl Health. 2010 Apr 19;4:8. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-4-8.
6
Research in complex humanitarian emergencies: the Médecins Sans Frontières/Epicentre experience.复杂人道主义紧急情况中的研究:无国界医生组织/流行病防治中心的经验
PLoS Med. 2008 Apr 15;5(4):e89. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050089.
7
Preparedness for humanitarian crises needs to be improved.应对人道主义危机的准备工作需要改进。
BMJ. 2006 Oct 21;333(7573):843-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38994.548125.94.