Eriksson Anneli, Gerdin Martin, Garfield Richard, Tylleskar Thorkild, von Schreeb Johan
Department of Public Health Sciences, Health System and Policy, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
ERRB, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
PLoS Curr. 2016 Jun 28;8:ecurrents.dis.d59e0fa39887031e1c3763851a6e5c2a. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.d59e0fa39887031e1c3763851a6e5c2a.
Humanitarian assistance is designated to save lives and alleviate suffering among people affected by disasters. In 2014, close to 25 billion USD was allocated to humanitarian assistance, more than 80% of it from governmental donors and EU institutions. Most of these funds are devoted to Complex Emergencies (CE). It is widely accepted that the needs of the affected population should be the main determinant for resource allocations of humanitarian funding. However, to date no common, systematic, and transparent system for needs-based allocations exists. In an earlier paper, an easy-to-use model, "the 7eed model", based on readily available indicators that distinguished between levels of severity among disaster-affected countries was presented. The aim of this paper is to assess the usefulness of the 7eed model in regards to 1) data availability, 2) variations between CE effected countries and sensitivity to change over time, and 3) reliability in capturing severity and levels of need.
We applied the 7eed model to 25 countries with CE using data from 2013 to 2015. Data availability and indicator value variations were assessed using heat maps. To calculate a severity score and a needs score, we applied a standardised mathematical formula, based on the UTSTEIN template. We assessed the model for reliability on previous CEs with a "known" outcome in terms of excess mortality.
Most of the required data was available for nearly all countries and indicators, and availability increased over time. The 7eed model was able to discriminate between levels of severity and needs among countries. Comparison with historical complex disasters showed a correlation between excess mortality and severity score.
Our study indicates that the proposed 7eed model can serve as a useful tool for setting funding levels for humanitarian assistance according to measurable levels of need. The 7eed model provides national level information but does not take into account local variations or specific contextual factors.
人道主义援助旨在拯救生命并减轻受灾民众的苦难。2014年,近250亿美元被分配用于人道主义援助,其中80%以上来自政府捐助者和欧盟机构。这些资金大部分用于复杂紧急情况(CE)。人们普遍认为,受灾人口的需求应是人道主义资金分配的主要决定因素。然而,迄今为止,尚不存在基于需求分配的通用、系统且透明的体系。在早期的一篇论文中,提出了一个易于使用的模型,即“7eed模型”,该模型基于现成的指标,可区分受灾国家的严重程度级别。本文的目的是评估7eed模型在以下方面的有用性:1)数据可用性;2)受复杂紧急情况影响的国家之间的差异以及对随时间变化的敏感性;3)在捕捉严重程度和需求水平方面的可靠性。
我们使用2013年至2015年的数据,将7eed模型应用于25个遭受复杂紧急情况的国家。使用热图评估数据可用性和指标值变化。为了计算严重程度得分和需求得分,我们应用了基于UTSTEIN模板的标准化数学公式。我们根据超额死亡率这一“已知”结果,评估该模型对先前复杂紧急情况的可靠性。
几乎所有国家和指标的大部分所需数据均可用,且数据可用性随时间增加。7eed模型能够区分各国的严重程度和需求水平。与历史复杂灾难的比较表明,超额死亡率与严重程度得分之间存在相关性。
我们的研究表明,所提出的7eed模型可作为根据可衡量的需求水平设定人道主义援助资金水平的有用工具。7eed模型提供国家层面的信息,但未考虑当地差异或具体背景因素。