Salanti Georgia, Higgins Julian P T, Trikalinos Thomas A, Ioannidis John P A
MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Stat Med. 2007 Feb 10;26(3):553-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.2575.
Violation of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) can raise doubts about the validity of the conclusions from genetic association studies. However, for most currently performed gene-disease association studies, the available tests have low power to detect deviations from HWE. We consider this issue from a meta-analysis perspective, and suggest an approach to estimate the deviation and investigate its relationship with the observed genetic effects. Different degrees of deviation from HWE have previously been proposed as a potential source of heterogeneity across studies. We present a hierarchical meta-regression model that can be applied to test this assumption, using the concept of the fixation coefficient. We re-analyse seven meta-analyses to illustrate these methods. The uncertainty in the genetic effect estimate tended to increase once the fixation coefficient was taken into account. Dependence of the genetic effect size on the deviation from HWE was found in one meta-analysis, while in the other six examples, deviations from HWE did not clearly explain between-study heterogeneity in the genetic effects. The proposed hierarchical models allow the synthesis of data across gene-disease association studies with appropriate consideration of HWE issues.
违反哈迪-温伯格平衡(HWE)会引发对基因关联研究结论有效性的质疑。然而,对于目前大多数进行的基因-疾病关联研究而言,现有的检验方法检测偏离HWE的能力较低。我们从荟萃分析的角度考虑这个问题,并提出一种方法来估计偏差并研究其与观察到的基因效应之间的关系。先前已提出不同程度的偏离HWE是各研究间异质性的一个潜在来源。我们提出一种分层荟萃回归模型,该模型可利用固定系数的概念来检验这一假设。我们重新分析了七项荟萃分析以说明这些方法。一旦考虑固定系数,基因效应估计中的不确定性往往会增加。在一项荟萃分析中发现基因效应大小与偏离HWE之间存在依赖性,而在其他六个例子中,偏离HWE并未清楚地解释基因效应研究间的异质性。所提出的分层模型允许在适当考虑HWE问题的情况下综合基因-疾病关联研究的数据。