Caldwell Jane C, Evans Marina V, Marcus Allan H, Scott Cheryl Siegel, Chiu Weihsueh A, Okino Miles S, Preuss Peter W
National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, USA.
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006 Mar;36(3):291-4; discussion 295-8. doi: 10.1080/10408440600599240.
In their 2004 article, Clewell and Andersen provide their perspective on the application of mode-of-action (MOA) and pharmacokinetic considerations in contemporary cancer risk assessment using trichloroethylene (TCE) as a case example. TCE is a complex chemical toxicologically, with multiple metabolites, multiple sites of observed toxicity, and multiple potential MOAs. As scientists who are responsible for revising the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's draft risk assessment of TCE, we welcome input of the quality to which the Agency is held accountable. However, in our view, Clewell and Andersen do not present a sufficiently current, complete, accurate, and transparent review of the pertinent scientific literature. In particular, their article would need to incorporate substantial recently published scientific information, better support its conclusions about MOA and choice of linear or nonlinear dose-response extrapolation, and increase its transparency as to quantitative analyses in order to make a significant contribution to the scientific discussion of TCE health risks.
在其2004年发表的文章中,克莱韦尔和安徒生以三氯乙烯(TCE)为例,阐述了他们对作用模式(MOA)及药代动力学考量在当代癌症风险评估中的应用的看法。从毒理学角度来看,TCE是一种复杂的化学物质,具有多种代谢产物、多个观察到毒性的部位以及多种潜在的作用模式。作为负责修订美国环境保护局TCE风险评估草案的科学家,我们欢迎能让该机构负责的高质量意见。然而,我们认为,克莱韦尔和安徒生并未对相关科学文献进行充分及时、完整、准确且透明的综述。特别是,他们的文章需要纳入大量近期发表的科学信息,更好地支持其关于作用模式以及线性或非线性剂量反应外推法选择的结论,并提高其定量分析的透明度,以便对TCE健康风险的科学讨论做出重大贡献。