• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The perils and promise of modern risk assessment: the example of trichloroethylene.

作者信息

Kester Janet E, Clewell Harvey J

机构信息

Health Sciences Institute, ENVIRON International Corporation, 5401 Veterans Memorial Parkway, Suite 201, Saint Peters, MO 63376, USA.

出版信息

Clin Occup Environ Med. 2004 Aug;4(3):497-512, vi-vii. doi: 10.1016/j.coem.2004.03.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.coem.2004.03.006
PMID:15325318
Abstract

This article summarizes some of the major scientific shortcomings identified by reviewers of the draft "Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment: Synthesis and Characterization" (TCE HRA) in the context of current US Environmental Protection Agency risk assessment guidance and the Data Quality Act guidelines. Our purpose is not to further criticize the draft HRA but to highlight specific areas for improvement and suggest specific ameliorative actions that we believe would improve the scientific credibility (quality) of the final document. This exercise is expected to be applicable beyond the specific case of TCE, because the draft HRA surely exemplifies many of the new challenges being posed to risk assessment in general by the ever-increasing sophistication of modern science.

摘要

相似文献

1
The perils and promise of modern risk assessment: the example of trichloroethylene.
Clin Occup Environ Med. 2004 Aug;4(3):497-512, vi-vii. doi: 10.1016/j.coem.2004.03.006.
2
The use of mechanistic data and the handling of scientific uncertainty in carcinogen risk assessments. The trichloroethylene example.致癌物风险评估中机械数据的使用及科学不确定性的处理。三氯乙烯示例。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;35(1):80-94. doi: 10.1006/rtph.2001.1508.
3
Trichloroethylene risk assessment: a review and commentary.三氯乙烯风险评估:综述与评论。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009;39(9):782-97. doi: 10.3109/10408440903222177.
4
Difficulty of mode of action determination for trichloroethylene: An example of complex interactions of metabolites and other chemical exposures.三氯乙烯作用模式确定的困难:代谢物与其他化学暴露复杂相互作用的一个例子。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008 Mar;49(2):142-54. doi: 10.1002/em.20350.
5
Health risk assessment.健康风险评估
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1993 Apr;17(2 Pt 1):219-23. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1993.1019.
6
Scrutinizing ACGIH risk assessments: the trichloroethylene case.审视美国政府工业卫生学家会议的风险评估:三氯乙烯案例
Am J Ind Med. 2003 Aug;44(2):207-13. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10252.
7
Trichloroethylene health risks--state of the science.三氯乙烯的健康风险——科学现状
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 May;108 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):159-60.
8
A proposed methodology for selecting a trichloroethylene inhalation unit risk value for use in risk assessment.一种用于选择三氯乙烯吸入单位风险值以用于风险评估的拟议方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Feb;41(1):39-54. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.09.003. Epub 2004 Dec 10.
9
Risk assessment: the default conservatism controversy.风险评估:默认保守主义争议
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1995 Jun;21(3):431-8. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1995.1058.
10
Comments on article "Applying mode-of-action and pharmacokinetic considerations in contemporary cancer risk assessments: an example with trichloroethylene" by Clewell and Andersen.对Clewell和Andersen所著文章《在当代癌症风险评估中应用作用机制和药代动力学考量:以三氯乙烯为例》的评论
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006 Mar;36(3):291-4; discussion 295-8. doi: 10.1080/10408440600599240.