Drury Daniel G, Stuempfle Kristin J, Mason Clifford W, Girman Julia C
Human Performance Laboratory, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2006 May;20(2):390-5. doi: 10.1519/R-16154.1.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the influence of contraction velocity on the eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) torque production of the biceps brachii. After performing warm-up procedures, each male subject (n = 11) completed 3 sets of 5 maximal bilateral CON and ECC isokinetic contractions of the biceps at speeds of 90, 180, and 300 degrees x s(-1) on a Biodex System 3 dynamometer. The men received a 3-minute rest between sets and the order of exercises was randomized. Peak torque (Nm) values were obtained for CON and ECC contractions at each speed. Peak torque scores (ECC vs. CON) were compared using a t-test at each speed. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine differences between speeds. ECC peak torque scores were greater than CON peak torque scores at each given speed: 90 degrees x s(-1), p = 0.0001; 180 degrees x s(-1), p = 0.0001; and 300 degrees x s(-1), p = 0.0001. No differences were found between the ECC peak torque scores (p = 0.62) at any of the speeds. Differences were found among the CON scores (p = 0.004). Post hoc analysis revealed differences between 90 degrees x s(-1) (114.61 +/- 23) and 300 degrees x s(-1) (94.17 +/- 18). These data suggest that ECC contractions of the biceps brachii were somewhat resistant to a force decrement as the result of an increase in velocity, whereas CON muscular actions of the biceps brachii were unable to maintain force as velocity increased.
本研究的目的是确定收缩速度对肱二头肌离心(ECC)和向心(CON)扭矩产生的影响。在进行热身程序后,每位男性受试者(n = 11)在Biodex System 3测力计上以90、180和300度×秒⁻¹的速度完成3组,每组5次最大双侧肱二头肌CON和ECC等速收缩。受试者在每组之间休息3分钟,练习顺序随机。获取每个速度下CON和ECC收缩的峰值扭矩(Nm)值。在每个速度下使用t检验比较峰值扭矩得分(ECC与CON)。采用重复测量方差分析来确定速度之间的差异。在每个给定速度下,ECC峰值扭矩得分均高于CON峰值扭矩得分:90度×秒⁻¹,p = 0.0001;180度×秒⁻¹,p = 0.0001;300度×秒⁻¹,p = 0.0001。在任何速度下,ECC峰值扭矩得分之间均未发现差异(p = 0.62)。CON得分之间存在差异(p = 0.004)。事后分析显示90度×秒⁻¹(114.61±23)和300度×秒⁻¹(94.17±18)之间存在差异。这些数据表明,肱二头肌的ECC收缩在速度增加时对力量下降有一定抵抗力,而肱二头肌的CON肌肉动作在速度增加时无法保持力量。