School of Sport and Exercise, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, UK.
School of Sport, Health and Wellbeing, Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth, UK.
Sports Med. 2022 Sep;52(9):2061-2083. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01686-z. Epub 2022 May 10.
Eccentric training as a method to enhance athletic performance is a topic of increasing interest to both practitioners and researchers. However, data regarding the effects of performing the eccentric actions of an exercise at increased velocities are limited. This narrative review aimed to provide greater clarity for eccentric methods and classification with regard to temporal phases of exercises. Between March and April 2021, we used key terms to search the PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar databases within the years 1950-2021. Search terms included 'fast eccentric', 'fast velocity eccentric', 'dynamic eccentric', 'accentuated eccentric loading', and 'isokinetic eccentric', analysing both the acute and the chronic effects of accelerated eccentric training in human participants. Review of the 26 studies that met the inclusion criteria identified that completing eccentric tempos of < 2 s increased subsequent concentric one repetition maximum performance, velocity, and power compared with > 4 s tempos. Tempos of > 4 s duration increased time under tension (TUT), whereas reduced tempos allowed for greater volume to be completed. Greater TUT led to larger accumulation of blood lactate, growth hormone, and testosterone when volume was matched to that of the reduced tempos. Overall, evidence supports eccentric actions of < 2 s duration to improve subsequent concentric performance. There is no clear difference between using eccentric tempos of 2-6 s if the aim is to increase hypertrophic response and strength. Future research should analyse the performance of eccentric actions at greater velocities or reduced time durations to determine more factors such as strength response. Tempo studies should aim to complete the same TUT for protocols to determine measures for hypertrophic response.
离心训练作为一种提高运动表现的方法,越来越受到从业者和研究人员的关注。然而,关于以增加的速度进行运动的离心动作的效果的数据有限。本综述旨在为离心方法和分类提供更清晰的认识,涉及运动的时间阶段。2021 年 3 月至 4 月期间,我们使用关键词在 1950 年至 2021 年期间在 PubMed、SPORTDiscus 和 Google Scholar 数据库中进行了搜索。搜索词包括“快速离心”、“快速速度离心”、“动力离心”、“强调离心加载”和“等速离心”,分析了加速离心训练对人类参与者的急性和慢性影响。对符合纳入标准的 26 项研究进行审查后发现,与>4 s 的时间相比,完成<2 s 的离心时间可提高随后的向心 1 次重复最大性能、速度和力量。>4 s 的持续时间会增加张力时间(TUT),而减少的时间会完成更大的量。当与减少的时间完成的量相匹配时,更大的 TUT 会导致更大的血乳酸、生长激素和睾酮积累。总体而言,有证据支持持续时间<2 s 的离心动作可改善随后的向心性能。如果目的是增加肥大反应和力量,使用 2-6 s 的离心时间没有明显区别。未来的研究应该分析更大速度或减少时间持续时间的离心动作的性能,以确定更多因素,如力量反应。节奏研究应旨在为协议完成相同的 TUT,以确定肥大反应的衡量标准。