Suppr超能文献

制定腰椎管狭窄症手术改进标准的方法学途径。

Methodological approaches to developing criteria for improvement in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.

作者信息

Tuli Sagun K, Yerby Scott A, Katz Jeffrey N

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brookline, MA 02445, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 15;31(11):1276-80. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217615.20018.6c.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

The study design was an outcomes measure validation for overall patient success.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to validate an established lumbar spinal stenosis outcomes measure for individual patient success.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Brigham Spinal Stenosis (BSS) Questionnaire has been used to evaluate lumbar spinal stenosis patients since the early 1990s. The three-domain questionnaire has been previously validated for patient improvement in each domain, but criteria for overall patient success have not been established.

METHODS

The sample consisted of preoperative and 24-month postoperative BSS scores from 197 individuals who had undergone a lumbar decompressive procedure with or without an instrumented fusion. For each of the three BSS domains, we determined a threshold score that marked a successful outcome in that domain using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. We combined these threshold scores in different ways to produce varying definitions of overall surgical success.

RESULTS

The threshold for changes in the Symptom Severity and Physical Function domain scores were calculated as 0.46 and 0.42, respectively, while for Patient Satisfaction it was 2.42 based on the ROC analysis. The definition for individual patient success that requires the patient achieve threshold scores in each domain was less sensitive but more specific than alternative definitions of overall success that required the patient achieve at least two criteria or at least one criterion.

CONCLUSIONS

The threshold values for each domain were similar to previously established values and the most balanced definition of overall success required that a patient achieve at least two criteria.

摘要

研究设计

本研究设计是对患者总体成功情况的结果测量验证。

目的

本研究的目的是验证一种已确立的腰椎管狭窄症患者个体成功情况的结果测量方法。

背景数据总结

自20世纪90年代初以来,布里格姆椎管狭窄症(BSS)问卷一直用于评估腰椎管狭窄症患者。这个三领域问卷先前已针对每个领域患者的改善情况进行了验证,但尚未确立患者总体成功的标准。

方法

样本包括197例接受了腰椎减压手术(有或无器械辅助融合)的患者术前和术后24个月的BSS评分。对于BSS的三个领域中的每一个,我们使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线确定了一个标志该领域成功结果的阈值分数。我们以不同方式组合这些阈值分数,以产生不同的总体手术成功定义。

结果

根据ROC分析,症状严重程度和身体功能领域分数变化的阈值分别计算为0.46和0.42,而患者满意度领域的阈值为2.42。要求患者在每个领域达到阈值分数的个体患者成功定义,比要求患者达到至少两个标准或至少一个标准的总体成功替代定义敏感性更低但特异性更高。

结论

每个领域的阈值与先前确立的值相似,总体成功的最平衡定义要求患者至少达到两个标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验