Gjølstad Merete, Thorud Syvert, Molander Paal
National Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 8149 Dep., N-0033 Oslo, Norway.
J Environ Monit. 2006 May;8(5):537-42. doi: 10.1039/b601917j. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
This study describes occupational exposure to acrylates and other solvents during nail sculpturing, including comparative measurements of the exposure using four different sculpturing methods: The acrylic method, the UV-gel method, the acrylic powder method and the resin method. Thirty-two nail technicians working in 22 different salons participated in the study. In total, 92 measurements were performed, comprising 70 solvent measurements and 22 measurements of ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate. The solvents most frequently present in all samples were acetone, ethyl acetate, toluene and n-butyl acetate, measured in 96%, 94%, 91% and 81% of the samples, respectively. The study shows that the overall solvent exposure was low, with all measurements calculated as the additive effect (n = 70) below 20% of the OEL (arithmetic mean 0.06 and range 0.01-0.19). No statistically significant difference between sculpturing methods were observed (p = 0.05).
本研究描述了美甲造型过程中对丙烯酸酯类和其他溶剂的职业暴露情况,包括使用四种不同造型方法进行暴露的对比测量:丙烯酸方法、紫外线凝胶方法、丙烯酸粉末方法和树脂方法。在22家不同沙龙工作的32名美甲师参与了该研究。总共进行了92次测量,包括70次溶剂测量和22次氰基丙烯酸乙酯测量。所有样品中最常出现的溶剂是丙酮、乙酸乙酯、甲苯和乙酸正丁酯,分别在96%、94%、91%和81%的样品中检测到。研究表明,总体溶剂暴露水平较低,所有作为相加效应计算的测量值(n = 70)均低于职业接触限值的20%(算术平均值为0.06,范围为0.01 - 0.19)。未观察到造型方法之间存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.05)。