• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉解剖:130例连续病例的长期随访研究

Dissection of cervical arteries: Long-term follow-up study of 130 consecutive cases.

作者信息

Arauz Antonio, Hoyos Leticia, Espinoza Carlos, Cantú Carlos, Barinagarrementeria Fernando, Román Gustavo

机构信息

Stroke Clinic of the Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(2-3):150-4. doi: 10.1159/000093244. Epub 2006 May 10.

DOI:10.1159/000093244
PMID:16691024
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We describe the natural history, functional prognosis and long-term recurrences of patients with dissection of cervical arteries (DCA) in a sequential observational study.

METHODS

We describe 130 patients with angiographically-proven DCA admitted to the Neurology Institute in Mexico City (Mexico), and analyzed clinical and neuroimaging data, treatment and outcome. Treatment with either anticoagulation or aspirin was decided by the primary physician. Primary outcome measures were recurrence (stroke and death) and clinical outcome at 6 months. Follow-up studies were performed to determine recanalization.

RESULTS

Mean age was 35.4 years; 4 patients died (3%) and 126 were followed for 3,906 person/years; 17 patients (13%) had a heralding ischemic cerebral event (6 strokes, 11 TIAS) about 8 days before the diagnosis of DCA. After diagnosis, recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 6 patients (4.8%) within the 2 first weeks (1.5 persons/1,000 follow-up years). No significant differences were found between aspirin and anticoagulation. Recanalization was more frequent in vertebral dissections. Complete recanalization of vertebral dissections was associated with a favorable prognosis [OR 3.2 (95% CI 1.1-8.8; p = 0.02)].

CONCLUSIONS

In Mexico, DCA affects young adults and may present with a heralding stroke or TIA. We found rare, early ischemic recurrences. Vertebral territory dissections had better prognosis than carotid ones, particularly in patients with demonstrated complete recanalization.

摘要

背景与目的

在一项连续性观察研究中,我们描述了颈内动脉夹层(DCA)患者的自然病史、功能预后和长期复发情况。

方法

我们描述了130例经血管造影证实为DCA并入住墨西哥城(墨西哥)神经病学研究所的患者,并分析了临床和神经影像学数据、治疗及预后情况。抗凝治疗或阿司匹林治疗由主治医师决定。主要结局指标为6个月时的复发(中风和死亡)及临床结局。进行随访研究以确定再通情况。

结果

平均年龄为35.4岁;4例患者死亡(3%),126例患者随访了3906人年;17例患者(13%)在DCA诊断前约8天出现先兆性缺血性脑事件(6例中风,11例短暂性脑缺血发作)。诊断后,6例患者(4.8%)在最初2周内发生复发性缺血性中风(1.5例/1000人年随访)。阿司匹林和抗凝治疗之间未发现显著差异。椎动脉夹层再通更为常见。椎动脉夹层完全再通与良好预后相关[比值比3.2(95%可信区间1.1 - 8.8;p = 0.02)]。

结论

在墨西哥,DCA影响年轻人,可能伴有先兆性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作。我们发现早期缺血性复发罕见。椎动脉区域夹层的预后优于颈动脉夹层,尤其是在证实完全再通的患者中。

相似文献

1
Dissection of cervical arteries: Long-term follow-up study of 130 consecutive cases.颈动脉解剖:130例连续病例的长期随访研究
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(2-3):150-4. doi: 10.1159/000093244. Epub 2006 May 10.
2
Long-term outcome in patients with cervical-artery dissections: There is still a lot to know.颈动脉夹层患者的长期预后:仍有许多有待了解之处。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(2-3):215. doi: 10.1159/000093958. Epub 2006 Jun 15.
3
Aspirin vs anticoagulation in carotid artery dissection: a study of 298 patients.阿司匹林与抗凝治疗在颈动脉夹层中的应用:298例患者的研究
Neurology. 2009 May 26;72(21):1810-5. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a2a50a. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
4
Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with cervical artery dissections.新型口服抗凝剂在颈内动脉夹层患者中的疗效与安全性
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;38(4):247-53. doi: 10.1159/000366265. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
5
Fibromuscular dysplasia may herald symptomatic recurrence of cervical artery dissection.纤维肌性发育异常可能预示着颈动脉夹层出现症状复发。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(5-6):448-52. doi: 10.1159/000101470. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
6
Cervical arterial dissection: time for a therapeutic trial?颈动脉硬化夹层:进行治疗试验的时候到了吗?
Stroke. 2003 Dec;34(12):2856-60. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000098649.39767.BC. Epub 2003 Nov 6.
7
Antiplatelet Therapy vs Anticoagulation Therapy in Cervical Artery Dissection: The Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS) Randomized Clinical Trial Final Results.抗血小板治疗与抗凝治疗在颈动脉夹层中的应用:中风研究中的颈动脉夹层(CADISS)随机临床试验最终结果。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jun 1;76(6):657-664. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0072.
8
Recanalization of cervical artery dissection: influencing factors and role in neurological outcome.颈内动脉夹层再通:影响因素及其对神经功能预后的作用
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17(2-3):93-7. doi: 10.1159/000075775. Epub 2003 Dec 23.
9
Polyarterial clustered recurrence of cervical artery dissection seems to be the rule.颈内动脉夹层的多动脉簇状复发似乎是规律。
Neurology. 2007 Jul 10;69(2):180-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000265595.50915.1e.
10
Anticoagulation vs Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients with Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissection: A Study of 370 Patients and Literature Review.颈动脉和椎动脉夹层患者的抗凝治疗与抗血小板治疗:370例患者的研究及文献综述
Neurosurgery. 2017 Mar 1;80(3):368-379. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw086.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of spontaneous recanalization of occlusive cervical artery dissection on risk of stroke.颈内动脉夹层闭塞自发再通对中风风险的影响。
J Neurol. 2025 Sep 11;272(9):627. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13371-y.
2
Serial changes and optimal imaging windows in vessel wall MRI for unruptured intracranial artery dissection.未破裂颅内动脉夹层的血管壁磁共振成像的系列变化及最佳成像窗口
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05732-4.
3
Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection: Updated systematic review.用于颈动脉夹层的抗血栓药物:最新系统评价
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Oct 26:23969873241292278. doi: 10.1177/23969873241292278.
4
Spontaneous triple vessel cervicocephalic artery dissection in a young gentleman: A case report.一名年轻男性自发性颈脑三联血管夹层:病例报告
Qatar Med J. 2024 Feb 10;2024(1):6. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2024.6. eCollection 2024.
5
Recurrence of cervical artery dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.颈内动脉夹层的复发:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Apr;19(4):388-396. doi: 10.1177/17474930231201434. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
6
Diagnosis and management of occlusion in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中闭塞的诊断与处理
Eur J Radiol Open. 2023 Aug 14;11:100513. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100513. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Cervical Artery Dissections: Etiopathogenesis and Management.颈动脉夹层:病因发病机制与治疗管理。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022 Sep 2;18:685-700. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S362844. eCollection 2022.
8
Antiplatelets Versus Anticoagulation in Cervical Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 2064 Patients.抗血小板与抗凝治疗在颈动脉夹层中的应用:2064 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs R D. 2022 Sep;22(3):187-203. doi: 10.1007/s40268-022-00398-z. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
9
"Incidence, characteristics and prognosis of cervical artery dissection-induced ischemic stroke in central Iran".“伊朗中部颈动脉夹层引起的缺血性卒中的发病率、特征和预后”。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02754-7.
10
Antiplatelets or anticoagulants? Secondary prevention in cervical artery dissection: an updated meta-analysis.抗血小板药物还是抗凝药物?颈动脉夹层的二级预防:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Neurol Res Pract. 2022 Jun 13;4(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s42466-022-00188-7.