Riboldi Marco, Baroni Guido, Spadea Maria Francesca, Bassanini Fabio, Tagaste Barbara, Garibaldi Cristina, Orecchia Roberto, Pedotti Antonio
TBMLab, Department of Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano University, Pza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano 20133, Italy.
Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):1141-52. doi: 10.1118/1.2181299.
In the field of extra-cranial radiotherapy, several inaccuracies can make the application of frameless stereotactic localization techniques error-prone. When optical tracking systems based on surface fiducials are used, inter- and intra-fractional uncertainties in marker three-dimensional (3D) detection may lead to inexact tumor position estimation, resulting in erroneous patient setup. This is due to the fact that external fiducials misdetection results in deformation effects that are poorly handled in a rigid-body approach. In this work, the performance of two frameless stereotactic localization algorithms for 3D tumor position reconstruction in extra-cranial radiotherapy has been specifically tested. Two strategies, unweighted versus weighted, for stereotactic tumor localization were examined by exploiting data coming from 46 patients treated for extra-cranial lesions. Measured isocenter displacements and rotations were combined to define isocentric procedures, featuring 6 degrees of freedom, for correcting patient alignment (isocentric positioning correction). The sensitivity of the algorithms to uncertainties in the 3D localization of fiducials was investigated by means of 184 numerical simulations. The performance of the implemented isocentric positioning correction was compared to conventional point-based registration. The isocentric positioning correction algorithm was tested on a clinical dataset of inter-fractional and intra-fractional setup errors, which was collected by means of an optical tracker on the same group of patients. The weighted strategy exhibited a lower sensitivity to fiducial localization errors in simulated misalignments than those of the unweighted strategy. Isocenter 3D displacements provided by the weighted strategy were consistently smaller than those featured by the unweighted strategy. The peak decrease in median and quartile values of isocenter 3D displacements were 1.4 and 2.7 mm, respectively. Concerning clinical data, the weighted strategy isocentric positioning correction provided the reduction of fiducial registration errors, featuring up to 61.7% decrease in median values (versus 46.8% for the unweighted strategy) of initial displacements. The weighted strategy proved high performance in minimizing the effects of fiducial localization errors, showing a great potential in improving patient setup. The clinical data analysis revealed that the application of a robust reconstruction algorithm may provide high-quality results in patient setup verification, by properly managing external fiducials localization errors.
在颅外放射治疗领域,一些不准确因素会使无框架立体定向定位技术的应用容易出错。当使用基于体表基准点的光学跟踪系统时,标记物三维(3D)检测中的分次间和分次内不确定性可能导致肿瘤位置估计不准确,从而导致患者摆位错误。这是因为外部基准点误检测会导致变形效应,而刚体方法对其处理效果不佳。在这项工作中,专门测试了两种用于颅外放射治疗中3D肿瘤位置重建的无框架立体定向定位算法。通过利用46例接受颅外病变治疗患者的数据,研究了无加权和加权两种立体定向肿瘤定位策略。将测量的等中心位移和旋转相结合,以定义具有6个自由度的等中心程序,用于校正患者对准(等中心定位校正)。通过184次数值模拟研究了算法对基准点3D定位不确定性的敏感性。将实施的等中心定位校正的性能与传统的基于点的配准进行了比较。在同一组患者中,通过光学跟踪器收集了分次间和分次内摆位误差的临床数据集,并对等中心定位校正算法进行了测试。在模拟错位中,加权策略对基准点定位误差的敏感性低于无加权策略。加权策略提供的等中心3D位移始终小于无加权策略。等中心3D位移的中位数和四分位数的峰值下降分别为1.4毫米和2.7毫米。关于临床数据,加权策略等中心定位校正减少了基准点配准误差,初始位移的中位数减少了高达61.7%(无加权策略为46.8%)。加权策略在最小化基准点定位误差影响方面表现出高性能,在改善患者摆位方面显示出巨大潜力。临床数据分析表明,通过适当管理外部基准点定位误差,应用稳健的重建算法可能在患者摆位验证中提供高质量结果。