Dhossche Dirk Marcel, Shah Amitta, Wing Lorna
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, Mississippi 39216, USA.
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2006;72:267-84. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(05)72016-X.
The blueprints for the assessment, treatment, and future study of catatonia in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), which are submitted in this chapter aim to increase early recognition and treatment of catatonia in ASDs, show the urgency of controlled treatment trials, and increase collaborative and interdisciplinary research into the co-occurrence of these two enigmatic disorders. Catatonia should be assessed in any patient with ASDs when there is an obvious and marked deterioration in movement, pattern of activities, self-care, and practical skills, compared with previous levels, through a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation of medical and psychiatric symptoms. A formal diagnosis should be ascertained using ASD specific criteria for catatonia that takes into account baseline symptoms like muteness, echophenomena, stereotypy, negativism, or other psychomotor abnormalities. Any underlying medical and neurological conditions should be treated, and culprit medications or other substances that may cause catatonia should be eliminated. Separate treatment blueprints are presented for mild, moderate, and severe catatonia, featuring combinations of a psychological approach developed by Shah and Wing and medical treatments that have shown efficacy in catatonia: lorazepam challenge, lorazepam trial, lorazepam continuation, and bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). These treatment modalities in themselves are well established. Side effects and complications are known and manageable. Legal, ethical, and practice guidelines governing all treatment aspects should be followed. The treatment blueprints should be viewed as best estimates pending future controlled studies. The blueprint for the future study of catatonia in ASDs describes promising clinical and preclinical research avenues. Longitudinal studies need to assess the possible effect of early recognition and adequate treatment of catatonia in ASDs in order to avoid the impairment associated with chronicity. Effects of current and new anticatatonic treatments should be examined in experimental models of autism and catatonia. Finally, the role of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) dysfunction in autism, catatonia, and abnormal stress responses in these disorders should be further assessed.
本章提交的关于自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中紧张症的评估、治疗及未来研究的蓝图,旨在提高对ASD中紧张症的早期识别和治疗,显示出对照治疗试验的紧迫性,并增加对这两种神秘病症共病情况的合作性和跨学科研究。当ASD患者在运动、活动模式、自我护理和实践技能方面出现与先前水平相比明显且显著的恶化时,应通过对医学和精神症状的全面诊断评估来评估紧张症。应使用针对ASD的紧张症特定标准进行正式诊断,该标准应考虑到诸如缄默、模仿现象、刻板行为、违拗症或其他精神运动异常等基线症状。任何潜在的医学和神经疾病都应得到治疗,可能导致紧张症的罪魁祸首药物或其他物质应被消除。针对轻度、中度和重度紧张症分别给出了治疗蓝图,其特点是结合了Shah和Wing开发的心理方法以及已证明对紧张症有效的医学治疗方法:劳拉西泮激发试验、劳拉西泮试验、劳拉西泮持续治疗以及双侧电休克治疗(ECT)。这些治疗方式本身已得到充分确立。副作用和并发症是已知的且可控制。应遵循管理所有治疗方面的法律、伦理和实践指南。在未来的对照研究之前,治疗蓝图应被视为最佳估计。ASD中紧张症的未来研究蓝图描述了有前景的临床和临床前研究途径。纵向研究需要评估ASD中紧张症的早期识别和充分治疗的可能效果,以避免与慢性相关的损害。应在自闭症和紧张症的实验模型中研究当前和新的抗紧张症治疗的效果。最后,应进一步评估γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)功能障碍在自闭症、紧张症以及这些病症中异常应激反应中的作用。