Lishman Lori, Smyth Shirley Anne, Sarafin Kurtis, Kleywegt Sonya, Toito John, Peart Thomas, Lee Bill, Servos Mark, Beland Michel, Seto Peter
Environment Canada, National Water Research Institute, 867 Lakeshore Road, P. O. Box 5050, Burlington, Ontario, Canada L7R 4A6.
Sci Total Environ. 2006 Aug 31;367(2-3):544-58. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.03.021. Epub 2006 May 12.
Over the last ten years there have been reports of pharmaceuticals and personal care product (PPCP) residuals in municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents. The principle goal of this study was specifically to expand and in some cases establish a Canadian database for the presence of selected acidic drugs, triclosan, polycyclic musks, and selected estrogens in MWWTP influent and effluent. The impact of treatment configuration (e.g. lagoons, conventional activated sludge (CAS), and CAS followed by media filtration (CAS+filtration)) was also examined. For CAS systems, the most prevalent treatment type, the effect of operating temperature and SRT was evaluated. Selected PPCPs included ten acidic pharmaceuticals (i.e. a group of pharmaceuticals that are extractable at a pH of 2 or less), triclosan, five polycyclic musks and two estrogens. The pharmaceuticals and musks were selected on the basis of levels of use in Canada; reported aquatic toxicity effects; and the ability to analyze for the compounds at low levels. Twelve MWWTPs discharging into the Thames River, the second largest river in southwestern Ontario, were surveyed. The only common characteristic of acidic drugs is their extraction pH as they differ in their intended biological function and chemical structure. Many organics degraded by WWTP processes benefit from warm temperatures and long SRTs so the impact of these variables warranted additional attention. Influent concentrations and reductions for acidic drugs reported by this study were compared to other Canadian studies, when available, and European investigations. The data of this study seems consistent with other reports. Ten acidic drugs were considered by this study. Three were consistently present at non-quantifiable levels (e.g. CLF, FNP and FNF). Additionally, one analyte, SYL, presented results that were so inconsistent that the values were not analysed. The remaining six acidic pharmaceuticals were placed into three categories. IBU and NPX members of the first category had consistently high reductions. At the level of reduction achieved (i.e. median reduction of greater than 93%) and any effect of treatment type or operating characteristics would be subtle and non-discernable given the analytical noise. In the second group are KTP and IND, and definitive comments are difficult to make on the impact of treatment type and operational considerations due to a sparse data set (i.e. many influent values were at non-quantifiable concentrations). Median reductions were in the 23% to 44% range. In the last category are GMF and DCF which have median reductions of 66% and -34%, respectively. Several negative reduction values in the data set (i.e. twelve of twenty six sampling events) suggest that DCF may be deconjugated under certain conditions. This warrants further evaluation when analytical methods for measuring human metabolites of DCF are available. For both GMF and DCF, reduction does not appear to be strongly influenced by SRTs up to 15 days, while SRTs over 30 days were associated with more frequent non-quantifiable effluent levels of DCF. This would suggest that better treatment would be provided by lagoons and CAS systems with extended aeration. Preliminary data suggests that temperature does not play a strong role in the reduction of these compounds. Triclosan (TCL) was detected at concentrations of 0.01-4.01 microg/L in influent samples and 0.01-0.324 microg/L in effluent samples. Reduction of TCL ranged from 74% to 98%. Lagoon treatment seems to be the best TCL reduction as it was present in the influent and effluent at quantifiable and non-quantifiable concentrations, respectively, on nine of nine sampling occasions. Influent and reduction values of five polycyclic musks (e.g. ADBI, AHMI, ATII, HHCB, and AHTN) were examined over the course of this study. AHMI was predominantly present at non-quantifiable concentrations. HHCB and AHTN were present at the highest concentrations. A comparison between Canadian values and those of European studies indicate that in general polycyclic musk concentrations in Canadian MWWTP effluents are 5-10 times lower. More extensive European and Canadian databases would be useful in confirming this initial observation. Median reductions for the five remaining musks range between 37% and 65% in CAS systems. CAS+filtration systems would be expected to have higher reductions if musks were bound to the effluent solids. This trend is not apparent but this may be due to the small size of the data set. In lagoon systems, musk reduction for HHCB and AHTN are approximately 98-99%. For ADBI and ATII musk, there are no numerical reduction values as most often the effluent concentration was non-quantifiable. In some instances, both the influent and effluent concentrations were non-quantifiable. The hormones 17-beta-estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) were detected at concentrations of 0.006 to 0.014 and 0.016 to 0.049 microg/L, respectively. E2 was not detected in any effluent samples (<0.005 microg/L) whereas E1 was detected in effluent samples from CAS treatment plants (median of 0.008 microg/L), and in one sample from lagoons. These data demonstrate that there are detectable levels of PPCPs entering Canadian waterways at trace levels, and that only some of these compounds are being reduced in a significant proportion by municipal wastewater treatment processes.
在过去十年间,已有关于城市污水处理厂(WWTP)废水中存在药物和个人护理产品(PPCP)残留的报道。本研究的主要目标是专门扩展并在某些情况下建立一个加拿大数据库,用于记录市政污水处理厂进水和出水中选定酸性药物、三氯生、多环麝香和选定雌激素的存在情况。同时还研究了处理工艺配置(如氧化塘、传统活性污泥法(CAS)以及CAS后接介质过滤(CAS + 过滤))的影响。对于最常见的处理类型CAS系统,评估了运行温度和污泥龄(SRT)的影响。选定的PPCP包括十种酸性药物(即一组在pH值为2或更低时可萃取的药物)、三氯生、五种多环麝香和两种雌激素。这些药物和麝香的选择基于其在加拿大的使用水平、已报道的水生毒性影响以及低水平化合物分析能力。对排入安大略省西南部第二大河流泰晤士河的十二座市政污水处理厂进行了调查。酸性药物的唯一共同特征是其萃取pH值,因为它们在预期的生物学功能和化学结构上存在差异。许多通过污水处理厂工艺降解的有机物受益于温暖的温度和较长的污泥龄,因此这些变量的影响值得进一步关注。本研究报告的酸性药物进水浓度和去除率与其他加拿大研究(如有)以及欧洲调查进行了比较。本研究的数据似乎与其他报告一致。本研究考虑了十种酸性药物。其中三种在不可量化水平持续存在(如CLF、FNP和FNF)。此外,一种分析物SYL的结果非常不一致,因此未对其值进行分析。其余六种酸性药物分为三类。第一类的布洛芬(IBU)和萘普生(NPX)去除率始终很高。鉴于分析噪声,在达到的去除水平(即中位数去除率大于93%)下,处理类型或运行特性的任何影响都将是细微且难以察觉的。第二类是酮洛芬(KTP)和吲哚美辛(IND),由于数据集稀疏(即许多进水值处于不可量化浓度),难以对处理类型和运行因素的影响做出明确评论。中位数去除率在23%至44%范围内。最后一类是吉美芬(GMF)和双氯芬酸(DCF),其中位数去除率分别为66%和 - 34%。数据集中有几个负去除值(即二十六个采样事件中的十二个)表明DCF在某些条件下可能会去共轭。当有测量DCF人体代谢物的分析方法时,这值得进一步评估。对于GMF和DCF,在长达15天的污泥龄内,去除似乎不受其强烈影响,而超过30天的污泥龄与DCF更频繁的不可量化出水水平相关。这表明氧化塘和延长曝气的CAS系统可能提供更好的处理效果。初步数据表明温度在这些化合物的去除中作用不大。在进水样品中检测到三氯生(TCL)的浓度为0.01 - 4.01μg/L,在出水样品中为0.01 - 0.324μg/L。TCL的去除率在74%至98%之间。氧化塘处理似乎是三氯生去除效果最好的方法,因为在九个采样场合中的九个场合,进水和出水中的三氯生分别以可量化和不可量化浓度存在。在本研究过程中,对五种多环麝香(如ADBI、AHMI、ATII、HHCB和AHTN)的进水和去除值进行了研究。AHMI主要以不可量化浓度存在。HHCB和AHTN的浓度最高。加拿大值与欧洲研究值比较表明,总体而言,加拿大市政污水处理厂出水中多环麝香浓度低5 - 10倍。更广泛的欧洲和加拿大数据库将有助于证实这一初步观察结果。在CAS系统中,其余五种麝香的中位数去除率在37%至65%之间。如果麝香与出水固体结合,预计CAS + 过滤系统的去除率会更高。这种趋势并不明显,但这可能是由于数据集较小。在氧化塘系统中,HHCB和AHTN的麝香去除率约为98 - 99%。对于ADBI和ATII麝香,没有数值去除值,因为大多数情况下出水浓度不可量化。在某些情况下,进水和出水浓度均不可量化。激素17 - β - 雌二醇(E2)和雌酮(E1)的检测浓度分别为0.006至0.014μg/L和0.016至0.049μg/L。在任何出水样品中均未检测到E2(<0.005μg/L),而在CAS处理厂的出水样品中检测到E1(中位数为0.008μg/L),以及在一个氧化塘样品中检测到E1。这些数据表明,有可检测水平的PPCP以痕量水平进入加拿大水道,并且只有其中一些化合物在城市污水处理过程中被大量减少。