• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病假预测:一种筛查工具的开发

Prediction of sickness absence: development of a screening instrument.

作者信息

Duijts S F A, Kant I J, Landeweerd J A, Swaen G M H

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Netherlands.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2006 Aug;63(8):564-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.024521. Epub 2006 May 12.

DOI:10.1136/oem.2005.024521
PMID:16698807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2078122/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a concise screening instrument for early identification of employees at risk for sickness absence due to psychosocial health complaints.

METHODS

Data from the Maastricht Cohort Study on "Fatigue at Work" were used to identify items to be associated with an increased risk of sickness absence. The analytical procedures univariate logistic regression, backward stepwise linear regression, and multiple logistic regression were successively applied. For both men and women, sum scores were calculated, and sensitivity and specificity rates of different cut-off points on the screening instrument were defined.

RESULTS

In women, results suggested that feeling depressed, having a burnout, being tired, being less interested in work, experiencing obligatory change in working days, and living alone, were strong predictors of sickness absence due to psychosocial health complaints. In men, statistically significant predictors were having a history of sickness absence, compulsive thinking, being mentally fatigued, finding it hard to relax, lack of supervisor support, and having no hobbies. A potential cut-off point of 10 on the screening instrument resulted in a sensitivity score of 41.7% for women and 38.9% for men, and a specificity score of 91.3% for women and 90.6% for men.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that it is possible to identify predictive factors for sickness absence and to develop an instrument for early identification of employees at risk for sickness absence. The results of this study increase the possibility for both employers and policymakers to implement interventions directed at the prevention of sickness absence.

摘要

目的

开发一种简明的筛查工具,用于早期识别因心理社会健康问题而有缺勤风险的员工。

方法

利用马斯特里赫特“工作疲劳”队列研究的数据来确定与缺勤风险增加相关的项目。依次应用单变量逻辑回归、向后逐步线性回归和多元逻辑回归分析程序。计算了男性和女性的总分,并确定了筛查工具上不同临界点的敏感度和特异度。

结果

在女性中,结果表明感到沮丧、倦怠、疲惫、对工作兴趣降低、工作日有强制性变动以及独居是因心理社会健康问题而缺勤的有力预测因素。在男性中,具有统计学意义的预测因素包括有缺勤史、强迫性思维、精神疲劳、难以放松、缺乏上级支持以及没有爱好。筛查工具上潜在的临界点为10时,女性的敏感度得分为41.7%,男性为38.9%;女性的特异度得分为91.3%,男性为90.6%。

结论

本研究表明,有可能识别出缺勤的预测因素,并开发一种用于早期识别有缺勤风险员工的工具。本研究结果增加了雇主和政策制定者实施针对预防缺勤的干预措施的可能性。

相似文献

1
Prediction of sickness absence: development of a screening instrument.病假预测:一种筛查工具的开发
Occup Environ Med. 2006 Aug;63(8):564-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.024521. Epub 2006 May 12.
2
Psychometrics and validation of a screening instrument for sickness absence.疾病缺勤筛查工具的心理测量学与效度验证
Occup Med (Lond). 2008 Sep;58(6):413-8. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqn070. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
3
Approaches for predicting long-term sickness absence. Re: Schouten et al. "Screening manual and office workers for risk of long-term sickness absence: cut-off points for the Work Ability Index".预测长期病假的方法。回复:肖滕等人的《对办公室职员长期病假风险进行筛查:工作能力指数的临界点》。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 May 1;41(3):322-323. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3483. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
4
Prediction of long-term sickness absence among employees with depressive complaints.预测有抑郁抱怨的员工的长期病假。
J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Jun;22(2):262-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9334-0.
5
Predicting the two-year course of unexplained fatigue and the onset of long-term sickness absence in fatigued employees: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study.预测不明原因疲劳的两年病程及疲劳员工长期病假的发生:马斯特里赫特队列研究结果
J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Oct;46(10):1041-7. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000137714.46149.17.
6
Health problems and psychosocial work environment as predictors of long term sickness absence in employees who visited the occupational physician and/or general practitioner in relation to work: a prospective study.健康问题和心理社会工作环境作为因工作原因就诊职业医生和/或全科医生的员工长期病假预测因素的前瞻性研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Apr;60(4):295-300. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.4.295.
7
Job strain and psychologic distress influence on sickness absence among Finnish employees.工作压力与心理困扰对芬兰员工病假缺勤的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Sep;33(3):182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.003.
8
Physical work environment risk factors for long term sickness absence: prospective findings among a cohort of 5357 employees in Denmark.长期病假的体力工作环境风险因素:丹麦5357名员工队列中的前瞻性研究结果
BMJ. 2006 Feb 25;332(7539):449-52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38731.622975.3A. Epub 2006 Jan 30.
9
Explanations for gender differences in sickness absence: evidence from middle-aged municipal employees from Finland.病假中性别差异的解释:来自芬兰中年市政雇员的证据。
Occup Environ Med. 2008 May;65(5):325-30. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.033910. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
10
Occupational burnout and medically certified sickness absence: a population-based study of Finnish employees.职业倦怠与医学认证的病假:一项基于芬兰员工群体的研究。
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Feb;64(2):185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.06.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of sickness absence in police: Case study of Abu Dhabi police department, UAE.警察病假的决定因素:阿联酋阿布扎比警察局的案例研究
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 15;10(1):e23714. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23714. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
2
Predicting long-term sickness absence with employee questionnaires and administrative records: a prospective cohort study of hospital employees.用员工问卷和行政记录预测长期病假:一项对医院员工的前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Nov 1;49(8):610-620. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4124. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
3
Comparison of predicted psychological distress among workers between artificial intelligence and psychiatrists: a cross-sectional study in Tsukuba Science City, Japan.人工智能与精神科医生预测的工人心理困扰比较:日本筑波科学城的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 23;11(6):e046265. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046265.
4
Efficacy of an indicated prevention strategy on sickness absence and termination of the employment contract: a 5-year follow-up study.一项针对病假和终止雇佣合同的有针对性预防策略的有效性:一项为期 5 年的随访研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 May 1;47(4):258-267. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3945. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
The associations between childhood trauma and work functioning in adult workers with and without depressive and anxiety disorders.童年创伤与抑郁和焦虑障碍成年患者及无此类障碍成年患者工作功能的相关性。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 16;63(1):e76. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.70.
6
Long-term sickness absence in a working population: development and validation of a risk prediction model in a large Dutch prospective cohort.工作人群中的长期病假:在一个大型荷兰前瞻性队列中开发和验证风险预测模型。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 15;20(1):699. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08843-x.
7
Trajectories of future sickness absence and disability pension days among individuals with a new sickness absence spell due to osteoarthritis diagnosis ≥21 days: a prospective cohort study with 13-month follow-up.由于骨关节炎诊断导致新的缺勤期≥21 天的个体中未来缺勤天数和残疾养老金天数的轨迹:一项前瞻性队列研究,随访 13 个月。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 27;9(8):e030054. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030054.
8
Job Maintenance through Supported Employment PLUS: A Randomized Controlled Trial.通过支持性就业加强版实现工作维持:一项随机对照试验
Front Public Health. 2016 Sep 20;4:194. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00194. eCollection 2016.
9
Job Maintenance by Supported Employment: An Overview of the "Supported Employment Plus" Trial.支持性就业维持就业:“支持性就业加”试验概述。
Front Public Health. 2015 May 26;3:140. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00140. eCollection 2015.
10
[Risk factors for absenteeism due to sick leave in the petroleum industry].[石油行业因病假导致旷工的风险因素]
Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Feb;48(1):103-22. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048004609.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analysis of observational studies identifies predictors of sickness absence.一项观察性研究的荟萃分析确定了病假的预测因素。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1105-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
2
Predicting the two-year course of unexplained fatigue and the onset of long-term sickness absence in fatigued employees: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study.预测不明原因疲劳的两年病程及疲劳员工长期病假的发生:马斯特里赫特队列研究结果
J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Oct;46(10):1041-7. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000137714.46149.17.
3
Fatigue as a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study.疲劳作为职业事故中受伤的一个风险因素:马斯特里赫特队列研究的结果。
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i88-92. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i88.
4
Fatigue as a predictor of sickness absence: results from the Maastricht cohort study on fatigue at work.疲劳作为病假的预测指标:马斯特里赫特工作疲劳队列研究的结果
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i71-6. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i71.
5
An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study.一种研究工作人群疲劳状况的流行病学方法:马斯特里赫特队列研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i32-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i32.
6
Linear and nonlinear relations between psychosocial job characteristics, subjective outcomes, and sickness absence: baseline results from SMASH. Study on Musculoskeletal Disorders, Absenteeism, Stress, and Health.心理社会工作特征、主观结果与病假之间的线性和非线性关系:SMASH研究的基线结果。肌肉骨骼疾病、旷工、压力与健康研究。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Apr;5(2):256-68. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.5.2.256.
7
Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure.在职人员的疲劳:一种问卷调查方法的效度
Occup Environ Med. 2000 May;57(5):353-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.5.353.
8
The influence of work characteristics on the need for recovery and experienced health: a study on coach drivers.工作特征对恢复需求及体验到的健康状况的影响:一项针对长途客车司机的研究
Ergonomics. 1999 Apr;42(4):573-83. doi: 10.1080/001401399185487.
9
Psychosocial factors at work and sickness absence in the Gazel cohort: a prospective study.加泽尔队列研究中工作中的社会心理因素与病假情况:一项前瞻性研究。
Occup Environ Med. 1998 Nov;55(11):735-41. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.11.735.
10
Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations.SF-36健康调查荷兰语版本在社区和慢性病群体中的翻译、验证及标准化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1055-68. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00097-3.