Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Pampati Vidyasagar, Damron Kim S, McManus Carla D, Jackson Sheila D, Barnhill Renee C, Martin Jennifer C
Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, Kentucky 42003, USA.
Pain Physician. 2006 Jan;9(1):47-51.
Zygapophysial or facet joint pain in patients suffering with chronic spinal pain without disc herniation or radiculopathy may be diagnosed with certainty by the use of controlled diagnostic blocks. But, in patients suffering with either lumbar or cervical facet joint pain, even this diagnostic approach may be confounded by false-positives when using a single diagnostic block. It may also be confounded by the administration of anxiolytics and narcotics prior to, or during, the controlled diagnostic facet joint blocks. The effect of sedation on the validity and potential differential results in patients suffering with combined cervical and lumbar facet joint pain has not been evaluated.
To assess the effects of midazolam and fentanyl on the diagnostic validity of facet joint blocks in patients suffering with both cervical and lumbar facet joint pain.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
The design consisted of a placebo group receiving a sodium chloride solution and two experimental groups receiving either midazolam or fentanyl. Patients included in the study had been diagnosed with facet joint pain using controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks of the medial branches and L5 dorsal rami. They had been treated with lumbar and cervical facet joint nerve blocks and experienced good pain relief; and were presenting for repeat treatment after a period of symptom relief. The study was performed in an interventional pain management practice in the United States; a total of 60 patients participated with 20 patients randomly allocated into each group. Outcome measures included numeric pain scores, proportion of pain relief, and ability to perform prior painful movements.
Outcomes were assessed at baseline and after the administration of 1 of the 3 solutions (Group I, sodium chloride solution; Group II, midazolam; or Group III, fentanyl).
Overall, 50% of the patients were relaxed or sedated in the placebo group, while 100% of the patients in the midazolam and fentanyl groups were relaxed or sedated. As many as 10% of the patients reported significant relief (>= 80%) with the ability to perform prior painful movements.
Perioperative administration of sodium chloride, midazolam, or fentanyl can confound results in the diagnosis of combined cervical and lumbar facet joint pain. False-positive results with placebo or sedation may be seen in a small proportion of patients.
对于患有慢性脊柱疼痛但无椎间盘突出或神经根病的患者,通过使用对照诊断性阻滞可明确诊断关节突关节或小关节疼痛。但是,对于患有腰椎或颈椎小关节疼痛的患者,即使采用这种诊断方法,在使用单次诊断性阻滞时也可能出现假阳性结果。在对照诊断性小关节阻滞之前或期间使用抗焦虑药和麻醉药也可能造成混淆。尚未评估镇静对合并颈椎和腰椎小关节疼痛患者的有效性及潜在鉴别结果的影响。
评估咪达唑仑和芬太尼对合并颈椎和腰椎小关节疼痛患者小关节阻滞诊断有效性的影响。
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
设计包括一个接受氯化钠溶液的安慰剂组和两个分别接受咪达唑仑或芬太尼的试验组。纳入研究的患者已通过内侧支和L5背侧支的对照比较局部麻醉阻滞诊断为小关节疼痛。他们接受过腰椎和颈椎小关节神经阻滞治疗且疼痛得到良好缓解;在症状缓解一段时间后前来接受重复治疗。该研究在美国一家介入性疼痛管理机构进行;共有60名患者参与,每组随机分配20名患者。观察指标包括数字疼痛评分、疼痛缓解比例以及进行先前疼痛动作的能力。
在基线以及给予三种溶液之一(第一组,氯化钠溶液;第二组,咪达唑仑;或第三组,芬太尼)后评估结果。
总体而言,安慰剂组50%的患者放松或镇静,而咪达唑仑组和芬太尼组100%的患者放松或镇静。多达10%的患者报告疼痛显著缓解(≥80%)且能够进行先前的疼痛动作。
围手术期给予氯化钠、咪达唑仑或芬太尼可能会混淆合并颈椎和腰椎小关节疼痛的诊断结果。在一小部分患者中可能会出现安慰剂或镇静导致的假阳性结果。