• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Brief report: Reducing inappropriate usage of stress ulcer prophylaxis among internal medicine residents. A practice-based educational intervention.简短报告:减少内科住院医师中应激性溃疡预防措施的不当使用。一项基于实践的教育干预措施。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):498-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00435.x.
2
Effects of pharmacy resident led education on resident physician prescribing habits associated with stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-intensive care unit patients.药学住院医师主导的教育对非重症监护病房患者应激性溃疡预防相关住院医师处方习惯的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Jun 1;72(11 Suppl 1):S48-52. doi: 10.2146/sp150013.
3
An interprofessional approach to reducing the overutilization of stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult medical and surgical intensive care units.一种跨专业方法,用于减少成人内科和外科重症监护病房应激性溃疡预防措施的过度使用。
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Apr;48(4):462-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028013517088. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
4
Impacting cost and appropriateness of stress ulcer prophylaxis at a university medical center.影响大学医学中心应激性溃疡预防的成本及适宜性。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Oct;25(10):1678-84. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199710000-00017.
5
Impact of clinical pharmacy services on stress ulcer prophylaxis prescribing and related cost in patients with renal insufficiency.临床药学服务对肾功能不全患者应激性溃疡预防用药及相关费用的影响。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Aug;21(4):263-9. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12005. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
6
Impact of a clinical pharmacist stress ulcer prophylaxis management program on inappropriate use in hospitalized patients.临床药师应激性溃疡预防管理方案对住院患者不适当使用的影响。
Am J Med. 2015 Aug;128(8):905-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
7
Magnitude and economic impact of inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-ICU hospitalized patients.非重症监护病房住院患者应激性溃疡预防措施不当使用的程度及经济影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2200-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00839.x. Epub 2006 Sep 4.
8
Stress ulcer prophylaxis for non-critically ill patients on a teaching service.对教学医院中病情不严重患者的应激性溃疡预防措施。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;13(5):716-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00742.x.
9
Stress ulcer prophylaxis: reducing non-indicated prescribing after hospital discharge.应激性溃疡预防:减少出院后的非指征性处方。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Oct;44(10):1565-71. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P167. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
10
Variables associated with stress ulcer prophylaxis misuse: a retrospective analysis.与应激性溃疡预防用药不当相关的变量:一项回顾性分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Oct;57(10):2633-41. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2104-9. Epub 2012 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Discontinuation Guidance in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Patients: A Pre-Post Cohort Study.应激性溃疡预防停药指导对机械通气重症患者的影响:一项前后队列研究
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Aug;57(4):510-517. doi: 10.1177/00185787211061371. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
2
Appropriateness of Acid-suppressing Agents for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-intensive Care Unit Setting in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯非重症监护病房环境中使用抑酸剂进行应激性溃疡预防的适宜性
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 Jan-Mar;11(1):96-101. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_173_18.
3
A Successful Pharmacist-Based Quality Initiative to Reduce Inappropriate Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Use in an Academic Medical Intensive Care Unit.一项成功的基于药剂师的质量改进措施,以减少学术性医学重症监护病房中不适当的应激性溃疡预防用药
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018759116. doi: 10.1177/0046958018759116.
4
Impact of targeted educational interventions on appropriateness of stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill adults.针对性教育干预对危重症成年患者应激性溃疡预防措施适宜性的影响
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):948. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.03.948. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
5
Identifying Risk Factors Associated with Inappropriate Use of Acid Suppressive Therapy at a Community Hospital.识别社区医院不适当使用抑酸疗法的相关风险因素。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:1973086. doi: 10.1155/2016/1973086. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
6
Current Opinions on Stress-Related Mucosal Disease Prevention in Canadian Pediatric Intensive Care Units.加拿大儿科重症监护病房应激相关黏膜病预防的现状观点
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(4):299-308. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-20.4.299.
7
Improving appropriateness of acid-suppressive medication use via computerized clinical decision support.通过计算机化临床决策支持提高抑酸药物使用的合理性。
J Hosp Med. 2015 Jan;10(1):41-5. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2260.
8
IBCD: development and testing of a checklist to improve quality of care for hospitalized general medical patients.综合照护改善计划(IBCD):用于提高住院普通内科患者护理质量的检查表的制定与测试
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Apr;39(4):147-56. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39021-7.
9
Use of acid suppressive therapy in hospitalized non-critically ill patients.住院非危重症患者酸抑制治疗的应用
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Dec 6;3(6):93-6. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v3.i6.93.
10
Physicians' opinions of stress ulcer prophylaxis: survey results from a large urban medical center.医生对应激性溃疡预防的看法:来自大型城市医疗中心的调查结果。
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Mar;58(3):777-81. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2423-x. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in trauma patients.创伤患者的应激性溃疡预防
Crit Care. 2002 Dec;6(6):526-30. doi: 10.1186/cc1831. Epub 2002 Sep 25.
2
Overuse of acid-suppressive therapy in hospitalized patients.住院患者抑酸治疗的过度使用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov;95(11):3118-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03259.x.
3
Survey of stress ulcer prophylaxis.应激性溃疡预防调查
Crit Care. 1999;3(6):145-149. doi: 10.1186/cc368.
4
ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis. ASHP Commission on Therapeutics and approved by the ASHP Board of Directors on November 14, 1998.美国卫生系统药师协会应激性溃疡预防治疗指南。美国卫生系统药师协会治疗学委员会制定,1998年11月14日经美国卫生系统药师协会董事会批准。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999 Feb 15;56(4):347-79. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/56.4.347.
5
Risk factors for clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.需要机械通气的患者发生具有临床重要意义的上消化道出血的危险因素。加拿大重症监护试验组。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Dec;27(12):2812-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199912000-00034.
6
Strategies to improve compliance with evidence-based clinical management guidelines.提高循证临床管理指南依从性的策略。
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Dec;189(6):533-8. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00222-7.
7
Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.医生为何不遵循临床实践指南?一个改进框架。
JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458.
8
Impact of trauma stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines on drug cost and frequency of major gastrointestinal bleeding.创伤应激性溃疡预防指南对药物成本及严重胃肠道出血发生率的影响
Pharmacotherapy. 1999 Apr;19(4):452-60. doi: 10.1592/phco.19.6.452.31049.
9
National survey of stress ulcer prophylaxis.应激性溃疡预防的全国性调查。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Jan;27(1):98-103. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199901000-00034.
10
Gastrointestinal bleeding in the hospitalized patient: a case-control study to assess risk factors, causes, and outcome.住院患者的胃肠道出血:一项评估危险因素、病因及结局的病例对照研究
Am J Med. 1998 Apr;104(4):349-54. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00055-2.

简短报告:减少内科住院医师中应激性溃疡预防措施的不当使用。一项基于实践的教育干预措施。

Brief report: Reducing inappropriate usage of stress ulcer prophylaxis among internal medicine residents. A practice-based educational intervention.

作者信息

Liberman Joshua D, Whelan Chad T

机构信息

University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):498-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00435.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00435.x
PMID:16704396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1484795/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many inpatients receive stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) inappropriately. This indiscriminate usage increases costs and avoidable side-effects. Practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) methodology may improve compliance with published guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the response of internal medicine residents to an educational intervention regarding SUP.

DESIGN

A prospective, pre and postintervention cohort study using an educational intervention based on PBLI.

PATIENTS

Three groups of consecutively admitted patients (1 group preintervention and 2 groups postintervention) on the medicine ward at a University Hospital.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Rates of inappropriate SUP prescription and discharge with an inappropriate prescription.

RESULTS

One month after the intervention, inappropriate prophylaxis was significantly decreased (59% pre, 29% postintervention, P<.002). The rate of discharge with an inappropriate prescription also decreased, but was not significant (25% pre, 14% postintervention, P=.14). In the 6-month postintervention cohort, inappropriate SUP remained lower (59% pre, 33% postintervention, P<.007). The rate of discharge with an inappropriate prescription was also significantly lower (25% pre, 7% postintervention, P<.009).

CONCLUSION

Practice-based learning and improvement can improve compliance with published guidelines, and change practice patterns. After the intervention, both inappropriate prophylaxis and inappropriate prescriptions upon discharge were reduced. Importantly, the intervention was sustained, transmitted across academic years to a new class of interns who had not directly experienced the intervention.

摘要

背景

许多住院患者接受应激性溃疡预防(SUP)的方式并不恰当。这种不加区分的使用增加了成本以及可避免的副作用。基于实践的学习与改进(PBLI)方法可能会提高对已发布指南的依从性。

目的

调查内科住院医师对应激性溃疡预防方面教育干预的反应。

设计

一项前瞻性、干预前后队列研究,采用基于PBLI的教育干预。

患者

大学医院内科病房连续收治的三组患者(1组干预前,2组干预后)。

主要观察指标

不恰当的SUP处方率以及出院时带有不恰当处方的情况。

结果

干预后1个月,不恰当的预防措施显著减少(干预前59%,干预后29%,P<0.002)。出院时带有不恰当处方的比例也有所下降,但不显著(干预前25%,干预后14%,P=0.14)。在干预后的6个月队列中,不恰当的SUP仍然较低(干预前59%,干预后33%,P<0.007)。出院时带有不恰当处方的比例也显著降低(干预前25%,干预后7%,P<0.009)。

结论

基于实践的学习与改进可以提高对已发布指南的依从性,并改变实践模式。干预后,不恰当的预防措施以及出院时的不恰当处方都减少了。重要的是,这种干预得以持续,跨学年传递给了未曾直接经历该干预的新一届实习生。