Blagrove Mark, Haywood Suzanne
Department of Psychology, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea, UK.
J Sleep Res. 2006 Jun;15(2):117-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2006.00507.x.
There is debate about whether to include in the definition of nightmares a criterion that the imagery or emotions of the nightmare caused the person to wake up. This study investigates whether people believe that they can judge this cause of awakening. 42 participants recorded for 14 nights whether they had a dream, and decided for each dream whether it had or had not woken them. They then rated on a 5-point scale (where 1 = very certain and 5 = very uncertain) how certain they were in their decision of whether or not the dream woke them. Participants' mean certainty was high for decisions that the dream woke them (mean certainty = 1.60), and for very unpleasant dreams this mean certainty that the dream woke them was very high (mean certainty = 1.27). Dreams judged to have caused awakening were found to be more unpleasant than dreams judged not to have caused awakening. Although the inclusion of the awakening criterion did not increase the association of nightmare frequency with anxiety, there may be other advantages in the use of the awakening criterion.
关于在噩梦的定义中是否应纳入一项标准,即噩梦的意象或情绪导致当事人醒来,存在争议。本研究调查人们是否认为自己能够判断这种醒来的原因。42名参与者记录了14个晚上是否做了梦,并针对每个梦判断它是否将自己唤醒。然后,他们用5分制量表(1 = 非常确定,5 = 非常不确定)对自己判断梦是否将自己唤醒的确定程度进行评分。对于判断梦将自己唤醒的决定,参与者的平均确定程度较高(平均确定程度 = 1.60),对于非常不愉快的梦,这种梦将自己唤醒的平均确定程度非常高(平均确定程度 = 1.27)。被判断为导致醒来的梦比被判断为未导致醒来的梦更不愉快。虽然纳入醒来标准并没有增加噩梦频率与焦虑之间的关联,但使用醒来标准可能还有其他优点。