Suppr超能文献

评估由另一位病理学家复查病理材料的价值。

Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.

作者信息

Renshaw Andrew A, Gould Edwin W

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Baptist Hospital of Miami, 8900 N. Kendall Drive, Miami, FL 33176, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 May;125(5):737-9. doi: 10.1309/6A0R-AX9K-CR8V-WCG4.

Abstract

In many departments, some cases are reviewed routinely by a second pathologist within the same department before sign out. The value of this practice is not known. We reviewed and compared the disagreement and amendment rates for cases reviewed by 1 or more pathologists based on the results of blinded review. A total of 8,363 cases underwent blinded review, and of these, 1,087 (13.0%) were reviewed by more than 1 pathologist before sign out. The disagreement rate for cases reviewed by more than 1 pathologist (4.8%) was significantly lower than for cases reviewed by only 1 pathologist (6.9%; P = .004). The amendment rate decreased to 0.0% from 0.5%, but this decrease was not statistically significant (P = .12). Review of material by a second pathologist before sign out is associated with a lower disagreement rate. These results suggest second review of surgical pathology is of value, but the best selection of cases to be reviewed remains to be defined.

摘要

在许多科室,有些病例在签发报告前会由同一科室的另一位病理学家进行常规复查。这种做法的价值尚不清楚。我们根据盲法复查的结果,对由一名或多名病理学家复查的病例的分歧率和修正率进行了回顾和比较。共有8363例病例接受了盲法复查,其中1087例(13.0%)在签发报告前由一名以上病理学家进行了复查。由一名以上病理学家复查的病例的分歧率(4.8%)显著低于仅由一名病理学家复查的病例(6.9%;P = 0.004)。修正率从0.5%降至0.0%,但这种下降无统计学意义(P = 0.12)。在签发报告前由另一位病理学家复查材料与较低的分歧率相关。这些结果表明,外科病理学的二次复查是有价值的,但最佳的待复查病例选择仍有待确定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验