Suppr超能文献

应要求剖宫产:八个欧洲国家产科医生态度的比较

Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians' attitudes in eight European countries.

作者信息

Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Frè M, Marsal K, Bleker O, Librero J, Grandjean H, Gratia P, Guaschino S, Heyl W, Taylor D, Cuttini M

机构信息

Reproductive Sciences Section, Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2006 Jun;113(6):647-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00933.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the attitudes of obstetricians to perform a caesarean section on maternal request in the absence of medical indication.

DESIGN

Cluster sampling cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) associated maternity units in eight European countries.

POPULATION

Obstetricians with at least 6 months clinical experience.

METHODS

NICU-associated maternity units were chosen by census in Luxembourg, Netherlands and Sweden and by geographically stratified random sampling in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and UK. An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Obstetricians' willingness to perform a caesarean section on maternal request.

RESULTS

One hundred and five units and 1,530 obstetricians participated in the study (response rates of 70 and 77%, respectively). Compliance with a hypothetical woman's request for elective caesarean section simply because it was 'her choice' was lowest in Spain (15%), France (19%) and Netherlands (22%); highest in Germany (75%) and UK (79%) and intermediate in the remaining countries. Using weighted multivariate logistic regression, country of practice (P<0.001), fear of litigation (P= 0.004) and working in a university-affiliated hospital (P= 0.001) were associated with physicians' likelihood to agree to patient's request. The subset of female doctors with children was less likely to agree (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.20-0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

The differences in obstetricians' attitudes are not founded on concrete medical evidence. Cultural factors, legal liability and variables linked to the specific perinatal care organisation of the various countries play a role. Greater emphasis should be placed on understanding the motivation, values and fears underlying a woman's request for elective caesarean delivery.

摘要

目的

探讨产科医生在无医学指征情况下应产妇要求实施剖宫产的态度。

设计

整群抽样横断面调查。

地点

八个欧洲国家的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)附属产科单位。

研究对象

具有至少6个月临床经验的产科医生。

方法

在卢森堡、荷兰和瑞典通过普查选取NICU附属产科单位,在法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和英国通过地理分层随机抽样选取。使用匿名自填式问卷收集数据。

主要观察指标

产科医生应产妇要求实施剖宫产的意愿。

结果

105个单位的1530名产科医生参与了研究(回复率分别为70%和77%)。仅仅因为是“她的选择”而遵从假设的女性择期剖宫产要求的比例,在西班牙(15%)、法国(19%)和荷兰(22%)最低;在德国(75%)和英国(79%)最高,其余国家居中。采用加权多因素逻辑回归分析,执业国家(P<0.001)、对诉讼的担忧(P = 0.004)以及在大学附属医院工作(P = 0.001)与医生同意患者要求的可能性相关。有孩子的女医生子集同意的可能性较小(比值比0.29,95%可信区间0.20 - 0.42)。

结论

产科医生态度的差异并非基于具体的医学证据。文化因素、法律责任以及与各国特定围产期护理组织相关的变量发挥了作用。应更加重视理解女性要求择期剖宫产背后的动机、价值观和担忧。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验