Suppr超能文献

剖宫产与医院特征:对低风险分娩的长期分析

C-sections and hospital characteristics: a long term analysis on low-risk deliveries.

作者信息

Joaquim Inês, Pereira Luís Nobre, Nunes Carla, Mateus Céu

机构信息

Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Avenida Padre Cruz, 1600-560, Lisboa, Portugal.

Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics (CIEO) - University of Algarve, School of Management, Hospitality and Tourism, University of Algarve, Campus da Penha, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal.

出版信息

Res Health Serv Reg. 2022 Dec 14;1(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s43999-022-00014-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policymakers aim to reduce C-section (CS) rates, due to well documented overtreatment. However, little is known about how hospital characteristics relate to their c-section rates on low-risk deliveries (CSR-LRD).

METHODS

CSR-LRD were computed using inpatient data from all Portuguese National Health Service hospitals (2002-2011). Linear and Fractional Response Models were estimated to quantify the relationship between CSR-LRD and a set of hospital characteristics: hospital size, type (exclusively obstetrics or not), Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) availability, obstetrician-to-obstetric bed ratio, and teaching status.

RESULTS

CSR-LRD increased from 11.7% (2002) to 14.1% (2008), declining to 12.5% in 2011. While larger hospitals and hospitals with NICU had higher CSR-LRD rates, teaching status and obstetrician-to-obstetric bed ratio had no significant effect. Adjusted estimates, controlling for those four characteristics, indicate 91% of the variation in the CSR-LRD is left unexplained.

CONCLUSION

Hospital characteristics do not explain variation in CSR-LRD rates. Further studies considering medical practice, financial incentives to hospitals and/or physicians, and patient education are needed.

摘要

背景

由于过度治疗记录完备,政策制定者旨在降低剖宫产(CS)率。然而,关于医院特征如何与低风险分娩的剖宫产率(CSR-LRD)相关联,人们知之甚少。

方法

使用来自葡萄牙所有国家卫生服务医院(2002 - 2011年)的住院患者数据计算CSR-LRD。估计线性和分数响应模型,以量化CSR-LRD与一组医院特征之间的关系:医院规模、类型(是否为纯产科医院)、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)可用性、产科医生与产科床位比例以及教学地位。

结果

CSR-LRD从2002年的11.7%上升至2008年的14.1%,2011年降至12.5%。虽然较大的医院和设有NICU的医院CSR-LRD率较高,但教学地位和产科医生与产科床位比例没有显著影响。在控制这四个特征后的调整估计表明,CSR-LRD中91%的变异无法解释。

结论

医院特征无法解释CSR-LRD率的变异。需要进一步开展考虑医疗实践、对医院和/或医生的经济激励以及患者教育的研究。

相似文献

3
Unexpected term NICU admissions: a marker of obstetrical care quality?意外的 NICU 住院:产科护理质量的标志?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):395.e1-395.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
4
Caesarean section rates in an African country.一个非洲国家的剖宫产率。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1993 Jul;7(3):234-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1993.tb00401.x.
8
Caesarean sections in Mexico: are there too many?墨西哥的剖腹产手术:数量是否过多?
Health Policy Plan. 2001 Mar;16(1):62-7. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.1.62.
9
Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?剖宫产的费用总是比顺产高吗?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00690.x.
10
[Caesarean section in german hospitals: validity of hospital quality report data for monitoring C-section rates].
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Apr;77(4):278-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1381990. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

5
It's about time: Cesarean sections and neonatal health.是时候了:剖宫产术与新生儿健康。
J Health Econ. 2018 May;59:46-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
7
WHO Statement on caesarean section rates.世界卫生组织关于剖宫产率的声明。
Reprod Health Matters. 2015 May;23(45):149-50. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
9
Lowered national cesarean section rates after a concerted action.经过协同行动后,全国剖宫产率有所下降。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Apr;94(4):391-8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12582. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验