Ramirez R M, Villarejo M
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, Davis 95616.
J Bacteriol. 1991 Jan;173(2):879-85. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.2.879-885.1991.
proU expression has been proposed to form part of a general stress response that is regulated by increased negative DNA supercoiling brought about by environmental signals such as osmotic or anaerobic stress (N. Ni Bhriain, C. J. Dorman, and C. F. Higgins, Mol. Microbiol. 3:933-944, 1989). However, we find that although proU-containing plasmids derived from cells grown in media of elevated osmolarity were more supercoiled than plasmids from cells grown in standard media, they did not activate proU expression in vitro. The gyrA96 mutation and anaerobic conditions are known to affect DNA supercoiling but did not alter proU expression. Finally, the gyrase inhibitors coumermycin and novobiocin did not reduce in vitro proU expression. Therefore, this evidence rules out regulation by changes in DNA superhelicity for proU in Escherichia coli.
有人提出,proU表达是一般应激反应的一部分,该反应由环境信号(如渗透或厌氧应激)导致的负DNA超螺旋增加所调节(N. Ni Bhriain、C. J. Dorman和C. F. Higgins,《分子微生物学》3:933 - 944,1989年)。然而,我们发现,尽管从在高渗透压培养基中生长的细胞获得的含proU质粒比从在标准培养基中生长的细胞的质粒超螺旋程度更高,但它们在体外并未激活proU表达。已知gyrA96突变和厌氧条件会影响DNA超螺旋,但并未改变proU表达。最后,回旋酶抑制剂香豆霉素和新生霉素并未降低体外proU表达。因此,这一证据排除了大肠杆菌中proU受DNA超螺旋变化调节的可能性。