Staples Lauren G, McGregor Iain S
School of Psychology, University of Sydney, A18, NSW 2006, Australia.
Behav Brain Res. 2006 Sep 25;172(2):351-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.04.011. Epub 2006 May 18.
Cat odour and trimethylthiazoline (TMT) are two predator odours commonly used to study defensive behaviour in rats. However their reported efficacy varies markedly across laboratories. We assessed whether rat strain differences might explain such variation. Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats were tested for unconditioned and conditioned responses to both odours. Cat odour produced robust unconditioned and conditioned defensive behaviour, with notably stronger effects in Wistar rats. TMT produced limited unconditioned avoidance, but failed to elicit conditioned responses in either strain. Results support suggestions that faeces-derived odours such as TMT are less predictive of a predator threat than those derived from fur or skin, and identify the possibility that strain differences affect the defensive response seen to predator odours.
猫的气味和三甲基噻唑啉(TMT)是常用于研究大鼠防御行为的两种捕食者气味。然而,据报道它们的功效在不同实验室之间存在显著差异。我们评估了大鼠品系差异是否可以解释这种差异。对Wistar大鼠和Sprague-Dawley大鼠进行了针对这两种气味的无条件和条件反应测试。猫的气味引发了强烈的无条件和条件防御行为,在Wistar大鼠中的影响尤为强烈。TMT产生了有限的无条件回避反应,但在两种品系中均未引发条件反应。结果支持了这样的观点,即粪便来源的气味(如TMT)相比来自皮毛或皮肤的气味,对捕食者威胁的预测性更低,并确定了品系差异可能影响对捕食者气味的防御反应的可能性。