• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噬菌体在肠炎沙门氏菌中的裂解发育诱导SOS应答。

Induction of the SOS response by bacteriophage lytic development in Salmonella enterica.

作者信息

Campoy Susana, Hervàs Anna, Busquets Núria, Erill Ivan, Teixidó Laura, Barbé Jordi

机构信息

Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Virology. 2006 Aug 1;351(2):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 May 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.virol.2006.04.001
PMID:16713610
Abstract

Infection of Salmonella enterica with lytic mutants of either P22 or SE1 bacteriophages triggers the expression of its DNA damage-inducible SOS response through a lexA-dependent pathway. This induction of the SOS system strictly requires the presence of the bacteriophage kil gene. Accordingly, plasmid overexpression of the kil gene also promotes the S. enterica SOS network induction. Furthermore, S. enterica Gifsy prophages are induced following the infection with SE1 and P22 lytic derivatives. The observed data reveal a hitherto unknown SOS system-mediated fail-safe mechanism of resident prophages against infection with heteroimmune lytic bacteriophages and suggest a novel role for the kil family of proteins.

摘要

用P22或SE1噬菌体的裂解突变体感染肠炎沙门氏菌,会通过lexA依赖途径触发其DNA损伤诱导的SOS反应的表达。SOS系统的这种诱导严格需要噬菌体kil基因的存在。因此,kil基因的质粒过表达也会促进肠炎沙门氏菌SOS网络的诱导。此外,在用SE1和P22裂解衍生物感染后,肠炎沙门氏菌的Gifsy原噬菌体被诱导。观察到的数据揭示了一种迄今未知的SOS系统介导的常驻原噬菌体抵抗异源免疫裂解噬菌体感染的故障安全机制,并暗示了kil蛋白家族的新作用。

相似文献

1
Induction of the SOS response by bacteriophage lytic development in Salmonella enterica.噬菌体在肠炎沙门氏菌中的裂解发育诱导SOS应答。
Virology. 2006 Aug 1;351(2):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 May 19.
2
[Induction and migration of cryptic/defective Salmonella enterica prophages as a consequence of infection with lytic phages is an additional factor in stability of a coevolutionary vector].[由于感染裂解性噬菌体导致的隐匿性/缺陷型肠炎沙门氏菌前噬菌体的诱导和迁移是共进化载体稳定性的一个额外因素]
Genetika. 2010 Apr;46(4):563-7.
3
Phenotypes of lexA mutations in Salmonella enterica: evidence for a lethal lexA null phenotype due to the Fels-2 prophage.肠炎沙门氏菌中lexA突变的表型:因Fels-2原噬菌体导致lexA无效致死表型的证据
J Bacteriol. 2002 Nov;184(22):6235-49. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.22.6235-6249.2002.
4
Genetic and molecular analysis of GogB, a phage-encoded type III-secreted substrate in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium with autonomous expression from its associated phage.鼠伤寒沙门氏菌中噬菌体编码的III型分泌底物GogB的遗传和分子分析,其从相关噬菌体自主表达。
J Mol Biol. 2005 May 13;348(4):817-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.024.
5
Increased excision of the Salmonella prophage ST64B caused by a deficiency in Dam methylase.由于Dam甲基化酶缺乏导致沙门氏菌噬菌体ST64B切除增加。
J Bacteriol. 2005 Dec;187(23):7901-11. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.23.7901-7911.2005.
6
The role of prophage-like elements in the diversity of Salmonella enterica serovars.前噬菌体样元件在肠炎沙门氏菌血清型多样性中的作用。
J Mol Biol. 2004 May 28;339(2):279-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.058.
7
The newly isolated lytic bacteriophages st104a and st104b are highly virulent against Salmonella enterica.新分离出的裂解性噬菌体st104a和st104b对肠炎沙门氏菌具有高度毒性。
J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Jul;101(1):251-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02792.x.
8
Strain-Specific Gifsy-1 Prophage Genes Are Determinants for Expression of the RNA Repair Operon during the SOS Response in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium.菌株特异性 Gifsy-1 噬菌体基因是鼠伤寒沙门氏菌 SOS 反应期间 RNA 修复操纵子表达的决定因素。
J Bacteriol. 2023 Jan 26;205(1):e0026222. doi: 10.1128/jb.00262-22. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
9
Resuscitation of a defective prophage in Salmonella cocultures.沙门氏菌共培养物中缺陷前噬菌体的复苏
J Bacteriol. 2004 Jun;186(12):4038-41. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.4038-4041.2004.
10
Influence of SOS-inducing agents on the expression of ArtAB toxin gene in and .SOS 诱导剂对 和 中 ArtAB 毒素基因表达的影响。
Microbiology (Reading). 2020 Aug;166(8):785-793. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000939. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Phage provoke growth delays and SOS response induction despite CRISPR-Cas protection.尽管有CRISPR-Cas保护,噬菌体仍会引发生长延迟和SOS反应诱导。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Sep 4;380(1934):20240474. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0474.
2
Transcriptional dynamics during Rhodococcus erythropolis infection with phage WC1.在红球菌感染噬菌体 WC1 的过程中的转录动力学。
BMC Microbiol. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03241-4.
3
Temperature-dependent carrier state mediated by H-NS promotes the long-term coexistence of Y. pestis and a phage in soil.
温度依赖型载体状态介导的 H-NS 促进鼠疫耶尔森氏菌和土壤噬菌体的长期共存。
PLoS Pathog. 2023 Jun 22;19(6):e1011470. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011470. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Prophage Gifsy-1 Induction in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Reduces Persister Cell Formation after Ciprofloxacin Exposure.噬菌体 Gifsy-1 在鼠伤寒沙门氏菌血清型诱导后减少环丙沙星暴露后的持续期细胞形成。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Aug 17;11(4):e0187423. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01874-23. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
The book of Lambda does not tell us that naturally occurring lysogens of are likely to be resistant as well as immune.《Lambda 之书》并未告诉我们, 的天然溶原菌很可能具有抗性和免疫力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 14;120(11):e2212121120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212121120. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
6
Disarm The Bacteria: What Temperate Phages Can Do.解除细菌武装:温和噬菌体的作用
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023 Feb 1;45(2):1149-1167. doi: 10.3390/cimb45020076.
7
Sulfolobus islandicus Employs Orc1-2-Mediated DNA Damage Response in Defense against Infection by SSV2.嗜酸热硫化叶菌利用 Orc1-2 介导的 DNA 损伤反应来抵御 SSV2 的感染。
J Virol. 2022 Dec 21;96(24):e0143822. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01438-22. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
8
Resistance of Bacteria toward 475 nm Blue Light Exposure and the Possible Role of the SOS Response.细菌对475纳米蓝光照射的抗性及SOS反应的可能作用
Life (Basel). 2022 Sep 26;12(10):1499. doi: 10.3390/life12101499.
9
Bacteriophages Isolated From Turkeys Infecting Diverse Serovars.从火鸡中分离出的感染多种血清型的噬菌体。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 5;13:933751. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.933751. eCollection 2022.
10
A dual-function phage regulator controls the response of cohabiting phage elements via regulation of the bacterial SOS response.双功能噬菌体调控因子通过调控细菌 SOS 反应控制共存噬菌体元件的反应。
Cell Rep. 2022 Apr 19;39(3):110723. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110723.