Breksa Andrew P, Manners Gary D
Western Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, California 94710, USA.
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 May 31;54(11):3827-31. doi: 10.1021/jf060901c.
The antioxidant capacity (AOC) of three representative citrus limonoids, limonin, nomilin, and limonin glucoside, was examined by the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), beta-carotene-linoleic acid bleaching, and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assays. Pure compounds and proper negative (cinnamic acid) and positive (2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) and ascorbic acid) controls were used to remove any ambiguity in interpreting results. In all cases, limonin and nomilin gave results equivalent to those of cinnamic acid, indicating that they do not possess any inherent AOC and should not be considered antioxidants. Similar results were observed for limonin glucoside, with the exception of an anomalous result obtained from the beta-carotene-linoleic acid bleaching assay. Limonin glucoside was deemed not to be an antioxidant on the basis of the three unequivocal assays.
通过氧自由基吸收能力(ORAC)、Trolox 等效抗氧化能力(TEAC)、β-胡萝卜素-亚油酸漂白和 1,1-二苯基-2-苦基肼(DPPH)自由基清除试验,检测了三种代表性柑橘类柠檬苦素(柠檬苦素、诺米林和柠檬苦素葡萄糖苷)的抗氧化能力。使用纯化合物以及适当的阴性对照(肉桂酸)和阳性对照(2,6-二叔丁基-4-甲基苯酚(BHT)和抗坏血酸),以消除结果解释中的任何歧义。在所有情况下,柠檬苦素和诺米林的结果与肉桂酸相当,表明它们不具有任何固有的抗氧化能力,不应被视为抗氧化剂。柠檬苦素葡萄糖苷也观察到类似结果,但β-胡萝卜素-亚油酸漂白试验得到了一个异常结果。基于三项明确的试验,柠檬苦素葡萄糖苷被认为不是抗氧化剂。