Badets Arnaud, Blandin Yannick, Bouquet Cédric A, Shea Charles H
Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Societé.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 May;32(3):491-505. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.491.
Three experiments were conducted to determine if the intention to perform motor sequences in the future results in similar patterns of activation and inhibition as observed for verbal scripts. In Experiments 1 and 2, intention was induced by informing one group that they would be tested on the tasks following acquisition; the other group was not informed of the retention test. Recognition tests administered prior to and after the retention test indicated a strong intention superiority effect. However, intention instructions provided either at the end of acquisition (Experiment 1) or before acquisition (Experiment 2) failed to impact acquisition or retention performance of the motor sequences, but did influence the latency of responding on the retention test. Experiment 3 was designed to replicate the results of Experiments 1 and 2 using a within-subjects design and extend these findings to observation. The results indicated that intention instructions resulted in a strong intention superiority effect for both the physical and observational practice participants, but the performance on the intentional tasks was enhanced only for the observational practice group.
进行了三项实验,以确定未来执行运动序列的意图是否会导致与言语脚本中观察到的类似的激活和抑制模式。在实验1和实验2中,通过告知一组参与者他们将在习得任务后接受测试来诱导意图;另一组未被告知有记忆测试。在记忆测试之前和之后进行的识别测试表明存在强烈的意图优势效应。然而,在习得结束时(实验1)或习得之前(实验2)提供的意图指令未能影响运动序列的习得或记忆表现,但确实影响了记忆测试中的反应潜伏期。实验3旨在使用被试内设计重复实验1和实验2的结果,并将这些发现扩展到观察。结果表明,意图指令对实际练习和观察练习的参与者都产生了强烈的意图优势效应,但只有观察练习组的有意任务表现得到了提高。