Suppr超能文献

意图干扰效应。

The intention interference effect.

作者信息

Cohen Anna-Lisa, Kantner Justin, Dixon Roger A, Lindsay D Stephen

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY 10033, USA.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2011;58(6):425-33. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000110.

Abstract

Intentions have been shown to be more accessible (e.g., more quickly and accurately recalled) compared to other sorts of to-be-remembered information; a result termed an intention superiority effect (Goschke & Kuhl, 1993). In the current study, we demonstrate an intention interference effect (IIE) in which color-naming performance in a Stroop task was slower for words belonging to an intention that participants had to remember to carry out (Do-the-Task condition) versus an intention that did not have to be executed (Ignore-the-Task condition). In previous work (e.g., Cohen et al., 2005), having a prospective intention in mind was confounded with carrying a memory load. In Experiment 1, we added a digit-retention task to control for effects of cognitive load. In Experiment 2, we eliminated the memory confound in a new way, by comparing intention-related and control words within each trial. Results from both Experiments 1 and 2 revealed an IIE suggesting that interference is very specific to the intention, not just to a memory load.

摘要

与其他类型的待记忆信息相比,意图已被证明更容易被获取(例如,回忆得更快且更准确);这一结果被称为意图优势效应(戈施克和库尔,1993)。在当前研究中,我们证明了一种意图干扰效应(IIE),即在斯特鲁普任务中,对于属于参与者必须记住要执行的意图(执行任务条件)的单词,其颜色命名表现比不必执行的意图(忽略任务条件)的单词更慢。在先前的研究(例如,科恩等人,2005)中,脑海中有一个前瞻性意图与承担记忆负荷相混淆。在实验1中,我们增加了一个数字保留任务以控制认知负荷的影响。在实验2中,我们以一种新的方式消除了记忆混淆,即在每个试验中比较与意图相关的单词和控制单词。实验1和实验2的结果都揭示了一种意图干扰效应,表明干扰非常特定于意图,而不仅仅是记忆负荷。

相似文献

1
The intention interference effect.
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(6):425-33. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000110.
2
The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Sep;179:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
3
The difficulty of letting go: moderators of the deactivation of completed intentions.
Psychol Res. 2014 Jul;78(4):574-83. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0509-5. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
4
Task interference from event-based intentions can be material specific.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1636-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03195926.
5
The representation of delayed intentions: a prospective subject-performed task?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):976-92. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.976.
6
Attentional decoupling while pursuing intentions: a form of mind wandering?
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 1;4:693. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00693. eCollection 2013.
7
Intention framing in time-based prospective memory.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Aug;47(8):1226-1245. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000991. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
8
The specificity of prospective memory costs.
Memory. 2012;20(8):848-64. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.710637. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
9
Planning and realisation of complex intentions in patients with Parkinson's disease.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;76(11):1501-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.051268.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the Neural Basis of Prospective Memory Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 16;16:905491. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.905491. eCollection 2022.
3
Aftereffects and deactivation of completed prospective memory intentions: A systematic review.
Psychol Bull. 2020 Mar;146(3):245-278. doi: 10.1037/bul0000221. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
4
Structural correlates of commission errors in prospective memory.
Cortex. 2020 Mar;124:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.10.013. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
6
Attentional decoupling while pursuing intentions: a form of mind wandering?
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 1;4:693. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00693. eCollection 2013.
7
The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Aug-Sep;67(1-2):55-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
8
Failing to forget: prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):965-71. doi: 10.1037/a0029198. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):298-307. doi: 10.1037/a0021969.
2
Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jun;37(4):425-33. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.4.425.
4
Gone but not forgotten: the effects of cancelled intentions on the neural correlates of prospective memory.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Jun;64(3):215-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
5
Retrieval experience in prospective memory: strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval.
Memory. 2006 Oct;14(7):872-89. doi: 10.1080/09658210600783774.
6
The intention superiority effect in motor skill learning.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 May;32(3):491-505. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.491.
7
Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):327-42. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327.
8
Item-specific control of automatic processes: stroop process dissociations.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):638-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03196526.
9
Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects.
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):422-71. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.422.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验