El-Sharrawy Eman, Yagiela John A
Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Cairo, Egypt.
Anesth Prog. 2006 Spring;53(1):3-7. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2006)53[3:AEODRC]2.0.CO;2.
This study was conducted on 72 American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 patients scheduled for extraction of a mandibular third molar after inferior alveolar nerve block. Each patient was randomly administered one of the following ropivacaine concentrations: 0.75%, 0.5%, 0.375%, or 0.25% (18 patients per group). Onset of block (mean +/- SD) was rapid for both 0.75% (1.4 +/- 0.4 minutes) and 0.5% (1.7 +/- 0.5 minutes) ropivacaine but significantly slower for the 0.375% (4.2 +/- 2.5 minutes) and 0.25% (10.7 +/- 3.0 minutes) concentrations. Tooth extraction was performed successfully with the 0.5% and 0.75% concentrations, and supplemental injections were not required. Second injections, however, were required with 0.375% ropivacaine. Anesthesia was unsuccessful in 13 patients given 0.25% ropivacaine even after 3 injections. The mean durations of soft tissue anesthesia were 3.3 +/- 0.3 hours and 3.0 +/- 0.3 hours for the 0.75% and 0.5% concentrations, but significantly shorter with more dilute concentrations. The duration of analgesia showed a similar pattern, with the 0.75% and 0.5% concentrations producing prolonged analgesia of 6.0 +/- 0.4 hours and 5.6 +/- 0.4 hours. These results indicate that 0.5% and 0.75% concentrations were effective for intraoral nerve blockade, with both a rapid onset and prolonged duration of pain control.
本研究针对72例美国麻醉医师协会分级为1级、计划在进行下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉后拔除下颌第三磨牙的患者开展。每位患者被随机给予以下罗哌卡因浓度之一:0.75%、0.5%、0.375%或0.25%(每组18例患者)。对于0.75%(1.4±0.4分钟)和0.5%(1.7±0.5分钟)的罗哌卡因,阻滞起效(均值±标准差)迅速,但对于0.375%(4.2±2.5分钟)和0.25%(10.7±3.0分钟)的浓度,起效明显较慢。使用0.5%和0.75%的浓度成功完成了拔牙,无需追加注射。然而,使用0.375%的罗哌卡因需要进行第二次注射。给予0.25%罗哌卡因的13例患者即使在注射3次后麻醉仍未成功。0.75%和0.5%浓度的软组织麻醉平均持续时间分别为3.3±0.3小时和3.0±0.3小时,但浓度更稀时明显更短。镇痛持续时间呈现类似模式,0.75%和0.5%浓度产生的镇痛时间延长,分别为6.0±0.4小时和5.6±0.4小时。这些结果表明,0.5%和0.75%的浓度对口腔内神经阻滞有效,起效迅速且疼痛控制持续时间长。