• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较一所医学院校的千禧一代和X一代医学生。

Comparing millennial and generation X medical students at one medical school.

作者信息

Borges Nicole J, Manuel R Stephen, Elam Carol L, Jones Bonnie J

机构信息

Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown, Ohio 44272-0095, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2006 Jun;81(6):571-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000225222.38078.47.

DOI:10.1097/01.ACM.0000225222.38078.47
PMID:16728812
Abstract

PURPOSE

Two main generational cohorts comprising students enrolled in medical schools today are Generation Xers (born 1965-1980) and Millennial students (born 1981-1999). A subset is Cuspars (born 1975-1980), who share traits with both generations. Population theorists ascribe different personal characteristics, attitudes, and preferences to each group. The authors examined whether selected characteristics describing Generation X and Millennial students were quantifiable using a personality measure. Differences among Generation X, Millennial, and Cuspar medical students were investigated.

METHOD

Eight hundred and nine medical students (399 females and 410 males) who matriculated between 1989-94 and 2001-04 at the Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine completed the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). Differences in responses to the 16PF among the three generations were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).

RESULTS

Analyses showed significant differences for Generation X versus Millennial students on 10 of the 16 personality factors. Millennial students scored significantly higher than Generation X students on factors including Rule-Consciousness, Emotional Stability, and Perfectionism; Generation X students scored higher than Millennials on Self-Reliance. Millennials also were significantly different from Generation Xers on several other factors. Significant differences were noted among Cuspars, Generation Xers, and Millennials.

CONCLUSIONS

The 16PF is a useful tool to examine differences among these groups and to help understand the factors that constitute their personalities. Given differences among the generational groups, the authors forecast possible educational implications for medical school academic affairs and student services, and suggest areas for future research.

摘要

目的

如今就读于医学院的学生主要由两代人组成,即X一代(出生于1965年至1980年)和千禧一代学生(出生于1981年至1999年)。其中一部分是“ Cuspars”(出生于1975年至1980年),他们兼具两代人的特征。人口理论学家赋予每个群体不同的个人特征、态度和偏好。作者研究了使用人格测量方法是否可以量化描述X一代和千禧一代学生的特定特征。对X一代、千禧一代和Cuspar医学生之间的差异进行了调查。

方法

809名医学生(399名女性和410名男性)于1989 - 1994年和2001 - 2004年进入俄亥俄州东北部大学医学院,他们完成了16种人格因素问卷(16PF)。使用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)分析了三代人对16PF的回答差异。

结果

分析表明,在16种人格因素中的10种上,X一代学生和千禧一代学生存在显著差异。在包括规则意识、情绪稳定性和完美主义等因素上,千禧一代学生的得分显著高于X一代学生;在自立方面,X一代学生得分高于千禧一代。千禧一代在其他几个因素上也与X一代存在显著差异。Cuspars、X一代和千禧一代之间存在显著差异。

结论

16PF是检验这些群体之间差异并帮助理解构成其人格的因素的有用工具。鉴于不同代际群体之间的差异,作者预测了对医学院学术事务和学生服务可能产生的教育影响,并提出了未来研究的领域。

相似文献

1
Comparing millennial and generation X medical students at one medical school.比较一所医学院校的千禧一代和X一代医学生。
Acad Med. 2006 Jun;81(6):571-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000225222.38078.47.
2
Differences in motives between Millennial and Generation X medical students.千禧一代和 X 世代医学生动机的差异。
Med Educ. 2010 Jun;44(6):570-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03633.x.
3
Personality and specialty interest in medical students.医学生的个性与专业兴趣。
Med Teach. 2008;30(4):400-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590802043835.
4
Generational changes and their impact in the classroom: teaching Generation Me.代际变化及其对课堂的影响:教“自我一代”
Med Educ. 2009 May;43(5):398-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03310.x.
5
Do dental hygiene students fit the learning profile of the millennial student?牙科卫生专业的学生是否符合千禧一代学生的学习特点?
J Dent Educ. 2009 Dec;73(12):1372-8.
6
Personality traits of incoming WVU medical students: phase I gender findings.西弗吉尼亚大学医学院新生的人格特质:第一阶段的性别研究结果
W V Med J. 1999 May-Jun;95(3):123-6.
7
[Creativity and personality analysis in 302 medical students using personality questionnaires].
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2009 Mar;29(3):476-8.
8
Personality differences between surgery residents, nonsurgery residents, and medical students.外科住院医师、非外科住院医师和医学生之间的个性差异。
Surgery. 2010 Aug;148(2):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
9
Deaf college students' perceptions of their social-emotional adjustment.聋人大学生对自身社会情感调适的认知。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Fall;12(4):486-94. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm008. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
10
Personality traits associated with intrinsic academic motivation in medical students.医学生内在学习动机相关的人格特质。
Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):384-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03279.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational disruptions during lockdown, by generation: A European descriptive cross-sectional survey.封锁期间不同代际的职业干扰:一项欧洲描述性横断面调查。
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Aug;85(8):603-616. doi: 10.1177/03080226211057842. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Generational differences in career paths and effort allocation of graduates of a top-research medical school, Lebanon.黎巴嫩一所顶尖研究型医学院毕业生职业道路和精力分配的代际差异。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 3;25(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07179-7.
3
Assessment of the development of social skills among undergraduate medical students through participation in a socio-educational project during the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic: a Brazilian pilot study.
本科医学生参与新冠肺炎疫情期间社会教育项目对其社会技能发展的评估:巴西试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1197. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06188-2.
4
Is medical training solely to blame? Generational influences on the mental health of our medical trainees.仅仅是医学培训的错吗?代际因素对我们医学受训者心理健康的影响。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2329404. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2329404. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
Which Occupations Did People Engage in during Lockdown? A European Cross-Sectional Descriptive Survey by Generation.疫情封锁期间人们从事哪些职业?一项按世代划分的欧洲跨部门描述性调查。
Occup Ther Int. 2023 Aug 21;2023:3979298. doi: 10.1155/2023/3979298. eCollection 2023.
6
The Effects of Humor in Clinical Settings on Medical Trainees and the Implications for Medical Educators: A Scoping Review.临床环境中幽默对医学实习生的影响及对医学教育工作者的启示:一项范围综述
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Mar 17;33(2):611-622. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01769-0. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Generation-dependent non-educational characteristics of medical students.医学生与代际相关的非教育特征。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Dec 28;11:426. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1702_21. eCollection 2022.
8
Drawings to explore faculties' and students' perceptions from different generations cohorts about dental education: A pilot study.通过绘图探索不同代际群体的教师和学生对牙科教育的看法:一项试点研究。
BDJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;8(1):17. doi: 10.1038/s41405-022-00109-5.
9
Generational characteristics of general medicine students in Iran.伊朗普通医学生的代际特征。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Feb 26;11:42. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1645_20. eCollection 2022.
10
"Medical Student Syndrome"-A Myth or a Real Disease Entity? Cross-Sectional Study of Medical Students of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland."医学生综合征"——是一个神话还是一个真正的疾病实体?波兰卡托维兹西里西亚医科大学医学生的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 19;18(18):9884. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189884.