Suppr超能文献

疫情封锁期间人们从事哪些职业?一项按世代划分的欧洲跨部门描述性调查。

Which Occupations Did People Engage in during Lockdown? A European Cross-Sectional Descriptive Survey by Generation.

机构信息

Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, CEpiA Team, F-94010 Creteil, France.

Faculty of Health, Univ Paris Est Creteil, F-94010 Creteil, France.

出版信息

Occup Ther Int. 2023 Aug 21;2023:3979298. doi: 10.1155/2023/3979298. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to describe the occupations people engaged in more frequently during lockdown than before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic as a function of generation. The secondary objectives were to (i) describe the levels of importance, performance, and satisfaction for these occupations and (ii) identify factors affecting the levels of importance, performance, and satisfaction.

METHOD

We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey of young adults (YAs, aged 18-39), middle-aged adults (MAs, aged 40-59), and older adults (OAs, aged 60 or over).

RESULTS

2534 participants (YAs: 47%, MAs: 33%, and OAs: 20%) cited 4500 occupations. The occupations in which people most engaged were leisure occupations (67%), followed by productive occupations (31%) and then self-care (2%) occupations. YAs gave a median (interquartile range) importance score of 8 (6; 9) to leisure, 8 (7; 10) to productivity, and 8 (7; 10) to self-care. MAs gave a median importance score of 8 (6; 10) to leisure, 8 (7; 10) to productivity, and 8 (7; 10) to self-care. OAs gave a median importance score of 8 (7; 10) to leisure, 8 (7; 9) to productivity, and 9 (8; 10) to self-care. In a pre-/postlockdown comparison, the changes in performance scores among YAs were +5 (3; 6) for leisure, +4 (2; 5) for productivity, and +4 (3; 6) for self-care. Among MAs, these changes were, respectively, +4 (3; 6), +3 (2; 5), and +4.5 (3; 6). Among OAs, these changes were, respectively, +3 (1; 5) for leisure, +3 (2; 5) for productivity, and +2 (0; 4) for self-care. The changes in satisfaction scores among YAs were +3 (0; 5) for leisure, +3 (0; 5) for productivity, and +3 (1; 6) for self-care. Among MAs, these changes were, respectively, +3 (0; 5), +2 (0; 4), and +5 (0; 6). Among OAs, these changes were, respectively, +2 (0; 4), +2 (0; 4), and +2 (0; 4).

CONCLUSIONS

Lockdown led to stronger engagements in quiet leisure and alternative forms of socialization. Occupational therapists may have a role in helping community-dwelling people to balance and structure their new daily routine.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是描述在新冠疫情期间,与疫情前相比,不同代际人群更常从事的职业。次要目的是:(i)描述这些职业的重要性、绩效和满意度水平;(ii)确定影响重要性、绩效和满意度水平的因素。

方法

我们对年轻人(YAs,18-39 岁)、中年人(MAs,40-59 岁)和老年人(OAs,60 岁及以上)进行了一项在线横断面调查。

结果

共有 2534 名参与者(YAs:47%,MAs:33%,OAs:20%)列出了 4500 种职业。人们从事最多的职业是休闲职业(67%),其次是生产性职业(31%)和自我照顾职业(2%)。YAs 对休闲的重要性评分为 8(6;9),对生产力的重要性评分为 8(7;10),对自我照顾的重要性评分为 8(7;10)。MAs 对休闲的重要性评分为 8(6;10),对生产力的重要性评分为 8(7;10),对自我照顾的重要性评分为 8(7;10)。OAs 对休闲的重要性评分为 8(7;10),对生产力的重要性评分为 8(7;9),对自我照顾的重要性评分为 9(8;10)。在封锁前后的比较中,YAs 的表现评分变化为休闲+5(3;6),生产力+4(2;5),自我照顾+4(3;6)。在 MAs 中,这些变化分别为+4(3;6)、+3(2;5)和+4.5(3;6)。在 OAs 中,这些变化分别为休闲+3(1;5)、生产力+3(2;5)和自我照顾+2(0;4)。YAs 的满意度评分变化为休闲+3(0;5),生产力+3(0;5),自我照顾+3(1;6)。在 MAs 中,这些变化分别为休闲+3(0;5)、生产力+2(0;4)和满意度+5(0;6)。在 OAs 中,这些变化分别为休闲+2(0;4)、生产力+2(0;4)和自我照顾+2(0;4)。

结论

封锁导致人们更频繁地从事安静的休闲活动和替代形式的社交活动。职业治疗师可能在帮助社区居民平衡和构建他们的日常生活方面发挥作用。

相似文献

1
Which Occupations Did People Engage in during Lockdown? A European Cross-Sectional Descriptive Survey by Generation.
Occup Ther Int. 2023 Aug 21;2023:3979298. doi: 10.1155/2023/3979298. eCollection 2023.
2
The complexity of daily occupations in multiple sclerosis.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2006 Dec;13(4):241-8. doi: 10.1080/11038120600840200.
3
Exploring the impacts of COVID-19 on the lifestyles of community-living adults in Singapore: A qualitative study.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2022 Oct;69(5):546-558. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12812. Epub 2022 May 25.
4
Changes in Daily Occupations Patterns, Optimism, and Positive Affect During COVID-19 Lockdown.
Can J Occup Ther. 2023 Jun;90(2):152-160. doi: 10.1177/00084174231166260. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
Occupational performance problems in people with depression and anxiety.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2023 Feb;30(2):148-158. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1882562. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Occupations that people with late effects of polio perceive difficult to perform.
Occup Ther Int. 2014 Sep;21(3):98-107. doi: 10.1002/oti.1368. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
9
Exploring the occupational lives of Syrians under temporary protection in Turkey.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2021 Oct;68(5):434-443. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12756. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
10
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on occupational therapy practice and use of telerehabilitation - A cross sectional study.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 May;25(9):3614-3622. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202105_25845.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of occupational disruption during COVID-19 lockdowns on health: a cross-sectional study.
PeerJ. 2024 Jun 26;12:e17594. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17594. eCollection 2024.
3
Changes in Daily Occupations Patterns, Optimism, and Positive Affect During COVID-19 Lockdown.
Can J Occup Ther. 2023 Jun;90(2):152-160. doi: 10.1177/00084174231166260. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Activities Carried Out during the First COVID-19 Lockdown by Italian Citizens.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5):3906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053906.
2
Occupational changes during the COVID-19 lockdown in Jordan.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2022 Jul;29(5):430-440. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1983017. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
3
Productivity of Working at Home and Time Allocation Between Paid Work, Unpaid Work and Leisure Activities During a Pandemic.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Jan;40(1):77-90. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01078-7. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
4
Psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in France: a national assessment of at-risk populations.
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Nov 26;33(6):e100349. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100349. eCollection 2020.
5
Changes in daily life and wellbeing in adults, 70 years and older, in the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2022 Aug;29(6):511-521. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1933171. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
6
Meaningful activities during COVID-19 lockdown and association with mental health in Belgian adults.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 30;21(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10673-4.
7
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Who maintains good mental health in a locked-down country? A French nationwide online survey of 11,391 participants.
Health Place. 2020 Nov;66:102440. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102440. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
A Simple Decision Analysis of a Mandatory Lockdown Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Jun;18(3):329-331. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00581-w.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验