• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氟哌啶醇、劳拉西泮或两者联用治疗精神病性激越?一项多中心、前瞻性、双盲急诊科研究。

Haloperidol, lorazepam, or both for psychotic agitation? A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, emergency department study.

作者信息

Battaglia J, Moss S, Rush J, Kang J, Mendoza R, Leedom L, Dubin W, McGlynn C, Goodman L

机构信息

Alaska Psychiatric Institute, Anchorage, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 1997 Jul;15(4):335-40. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90119-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90119-4
PMID:9217519
Abstract

Rapid tranquilization is a routinely practiced method of calming agitated psychotic patients by use of neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, or both in combination. Although several studies have examined the efficacy of the three approaches, none have compared these treatments in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Ninety-eight psychotic, agitated, and aggressive patients (73 men and 25 women) were prospectively enrolled during an 18-month period in emergency departments in five university or general hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intramuscular injections of lorazepam (2 mg), haloperidol (5 mg), or both in combination. Patients in each treatment group received 1 to 6 injections of the same study drug within 12 hours, based on clinical need. They were evaluated hourly after the first injection until at least 12 hours after the last. Efficacy was assessed on the Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS), a modified Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (MBPRS), Clinical Global impressions (CGI) scale, and an Alertness Scale. Effective symptom reduction was achieved in each treatment group with significant (P < .01) mean decreases from baseline at every hourly ABS evaluation. Significant (P < .05) mean differences on the ABS (hour 1) and MBPRS (hours 2 and 3) suggest that tranquilization was most rapid in patients receiving the combination treatment. Study event incidence (side effects) did not differ significantly between treatment groups, although patients receiving haloperidol alone tended to have more extrapyramidal system symptoms. The superior results produced by the combination treatment support the use of lorazepam plus haloperidol as the treatment of choice for acute psychotic agitation.

摘要

快速镇静是一种通过使用抗精神病药物、苯二氮䓬类药物或两者联合使用来使躁动的精神病患者平静下来的常规方法。尽管有几项研究检验了这三种方法的疗效,但尚无一项研究在前瞻性、随机、双盲、多中心试验中对这些治疗方法进行比较。在5家大学医院或综合医院的急诊科,在18个月的时间里前瞻性地招募了98名患有精神病、躁动且有攻击性的患者(73名男性和25名女性)。患者被随机分配接受肌肉注射劳拉西泮(2毫克)、氟哌啶醇(5毫克)或两者联合使用。每个治疗组的患者根据临床需要在12小时内接受1至6次相同研究药物的注射。首次注射后每小时对他们进行评估,直至最后一次注射后至少12小时。疗效通过激越行为量表(ABS)、改良简明精神病评定量表(MBPRS)、临床总体印象(CGI)量表和警觉性量表进行评估。每个治疗组均实现了有效的症状减轻,在每小时的ABS评估中,与基线相比平均有显著(P <.01)下降。在ABS(第1小时)和MBPRS(第2和3小时)上存在显著(P <.05)的平均差异,表明接受联合治疗的患者镇静速度最快。尽管单独接受氟哌啶醇治疗的患者往往有更多锥体外系症状,但各治疗组之间的研究事件发生率(副作用)没有显著差异。联合治疗产生的更好结果支持使用劳拉西泮加氟哌啶醇作为急性精神病性激越的首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Haloperidol, lorazepam, or both for psychotic agitation? A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, emergency department study.氟哌啶醇、劳拉西泮或两者联用治疗精神病性激越?一项多中心、前瞻性、双盲急诊科研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 1997 Jul;15(4):335-40. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90119-4.
2
Efficacy of lorazepam and haloperidol for rapid tranquilization in a psychiatric emergency room setting.劳拉西泮和氟哌啶醇在精神科急诊室环境中快速镇静的疗效。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 May;12(3):175-9. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199705000-00009.
3
Risperidone liquid concentrate and oral lorazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol and intramuscular lorazepam for treatment of psychotic agitation.利培酮浓缩液与口服劳拉西泮对比肌肉注射氟哌啶醇与肌肉注射劳拉西泮治疗精神病性激越的疗效
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;62(3):153-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0303.
4
Risperidone versus haloperidol, in combination with lorazepam, in the treatment of acute agitation and psychosis: a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.利培酮与氟哌啶醇联合劳拉西泮治疗急性激越和精神病:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2006 Mar;12(2):103-8. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200603000-00005.
5
Intramuscular olanzapine versus intramuscular haloperidol plus lorazepam for the treatment of acute schizophrenia with agitation: An open-label, randomized controlled trial.肌内注射奥氮平与肌内注射氟哌啶醇加劳拉西泮治疗急性激越性精神分裂症:一项开放标签随机对照试验。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 May;114(5):438-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
6
A double-blind study of lorazepam versus the combination of haloperidol and lorazepam in managing agitation.一项关于劳拉西泮与氟哌啶醇联合劳拉西泮治疗激越的双盲研究。
Pharmacotherapy. 1998 Jan-Feb;18(1):57-62.
7
A double-blind, randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of intramuscular injections of olanzapine, lorazepam, or placebo in treating acutely agitated patients diagnosed with bipolar mania.一项关于肌肉注射奥氮平、劳拉西泮或安慰剂治疗急性躁狂发作的双相情感障碍躁狂症患者疗效和安全性的双盲、随机对照研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Aug;21(4):389-97. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200108000-00006.
8
Acute treatment of psychotic agitation: a randomized comparison of oral treatment with risperidone and lorazepam versus intramuscular treatment with haloperidol and lorazepam.精神病性激越的急性治疗:口服利培酮和劳拉西泮与肌肉注射氟哌啶醇和劳拉西泮的随机对照比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;65(3):386-94.
9
Intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive psychotic behavior.肌内注射氟硝西泮与肌内注射氟哌啶醇用于攻击性行为精神病患者的急诊治疗比较
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jan;156(1):142-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.1.142.
10
Effect of Lorazepam With Haloperidol vs Haloperidol Alone on Agitated Delirium in Patients With Advanced Cancer Receiving Palliative Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.劳拉西泮联合氟哌啶醇与单用氟哌啶醇对接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者激越性谵妄的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1047-1056. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11468.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing acute agitation and aggression in the world of drug shortages.在药品短缺的情况下应对急性激越和攻击行为
Ment Health Clin. 2021 Nov 8;11(6):334-346. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2021.11.334. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Treatment of Agitation With Lorazepam in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review.临床实践中使用劳拉西泮治疗躁动:一项系统评价。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 22;12:628965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.628965. eCollection 2021.
3
Intramuscular midazolam, olanzapine, or haloperidol for the management of acute agitation: A multi-centre, double-blind, randomised clinical trial.
肌内注射咪达唑仑、奥氮平或氟哌啶醇用于急性激越的管理:一项多中心、双盲、随机临床试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Feb 11;32:100751. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100751. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Characterizing the role of haloperidol for analgesia in the Emergency Department.确定氟哌啶醇在急诊科镇痛中的作用。
J Pain Manag. 2019;12(2):141-146.
5
Improving the management of acutely agitated patients in the emergency department through implementation of Project BETA (Best Practices in the Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation).通过实施BETA项目(躁动评估与治疗的最佳实践)改善急诊科急性躁动患者的管理。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jul 3;1(5):898-907. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12138. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Organisational interventions for preventing and minimising aggression directed towards healthcare workers by patients and patient advocates.预防和尽量减少患者及患者支持者对医护人员的攻击行为的组织干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 29;4(4):CD012662. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012662.pub2.
7
Treatment Options for Acute Agitation in Psychiatric Patients: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence.精神科患者急性激越的治疗选择:理论与实证依据
Cureus. 2019 Nov 14;11(11):e6152. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6152.
8
Association of Delirium Response and Safety of Pharmacological Interventions for the Management and Prevention of Delirium: A Network Meta-analysis.谵妄反应与药物干预管理和预防谵妄的安全性的关联:网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;76(5):526-535. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4365.
9
The pharmacological management of acute behavioural disturbance: Data from a clinical audit conducted in UK mental health services.急性行为障碍的药理学管理:英国精神卫生服务机构进行的临床审计数据。
J Psychopharmacol. 2019 Apr;33(4):472-481. doi: 10.1177/0269881118817170. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
10
Coadministration of intramuscular olanzapine and benzodiazepines in agitated patients with mental illness.在患有精神疾病的躁动患者中联合肌内注射奥氮平和苯二氮䓬类药物。
Ment Health Clin. 2018 Aug 30;8(5):208-213. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2018.09.208. eCollection 2018 Sep.