The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
CMAJ. 2012 Nov 6;184(16):E867-76. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120675. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
There is uncertainty about the optimal approach to screen for clinically important cervical spine (C-spine) injury following blunt trauma. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria, 2 rules that are available to assist emergency physicians to assess the need for cervical spine imaging.
We identified studies by an electronic search of CINAHL, Embase and MEDLINE. We included articles that reported on a cohort of patients who experienced blunt trauma and for whom clinically important cervical spine injury detectable by diagnostic imaging was the differential diagnosis; evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule or NEXUS or both; and used an adequate reference standard. We assessed the methodologic quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria. We used the extracted data to calculate sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and post-test probabilities.
We included 15 studies of modest methodologic quality. For the Canadian C-spine rule, sensitivity ranged from 0.90 to 1.00 and specificity ranged from 0.01 to 0.77. For NEXUS, sensitivity ranged from 0.83 to 1.00 and specificity ranged from 0.02 to 0.46. One study directly compared the accuracy of these 2 rules using the same cohort and found that the Canadian C-spine rule had better accuracy. For both rules, a negative test was more informative for reducing the probability of a clinically important cervical spine injury.
Based on studies with modest methodologic quality and only one direct comparison, we found that the Canadian C-spine rule appears to have better diagnostic accuracy than the NEXUS criteria. Future studies need to follow rigorous methodologic procedures to ensure that the findings are as free of bias as possible.
对于钝性创伤后临床重要的颈椎(C 脊柱)损伤的筛查方法,存在不确定性。我们进行了一项系统评价,以调查加拿大 C 脊柱规则和国家紧急 X 射线利用研究(NEXUS)标准的诊断准确性,这两种规则可帮助急诊医师评估颈椎成像的需求。
我们通过 CINAHL、Embase 和 MEDLINE 进行电子检索以确定研究。我们纳入了报告了一组经历过钝性创伤且可通过诊断成像检测到临床重要颈椎损伤的患者的文章;评估了加拿大 C 脊柱规则或 NEXUS 或两者的诊断准确性;并使用了适当的参考标准。我们使用诊断准确性研究质量评估标准评估了方法学质量。我们使用提取的数据计算了敏感性、特异性、似然比和后验概率。
我们纳入了 15 项方法学质量适中的研究。对于加拿大 C 脊柱规则,敏感性范围为 0.90 至 1.00,特异性范围为 0.01 至 0.77。对于 NEXUS,敏感性范围为 0.83 至 1.00,特异性范围为 0.02 至 0.46。一项研究使用相同的队列直接比较了这两种规则的准确性,发现加拿大 C 脊柱规则的准确性更高。对于这两种规则,阴性试验对于降低临床重要颈椎损伤的可能性更具信息性。
基于方法学质量适中的研究,并且只有一项直接比较,我们发现加拿大 C 脊柱规则的诊断准确性似乎优于 NEXUS 标准。未来的研究需要遵循严格的方法学程序,以确保结果尽可能不受偏见的影响。