Suppr超能文献

急诊科的分诊:全国性调查。

Triage in emergency departments: national survey.

作者信息

Göransson Katarina E, Ehrenberg Anna, Ehnfors Margareta

机构信息

Department of Caring Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2005 Oct;14(9):1067-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01191.x.

Abstract

AIM

This paper reports a study the aim of which was to describe how triage-related work was organized and performed in Swedish emergency departments.

BACKGROUND

Hospitals in many developed countries use some kind of system to prioritize the patients attending emergency departments. Triage is a commonly used term to refer to the process of sorting and prioritizing patients for care. How the triage procedure is organized and which personnel perform this type of work vary considerably throughout the world. In Sweden, few studies have explored this important issue.

METHOD

A national survey was conducted using telephone interviews, with nurse managers at each of the emergency departments. The sample represented 87% of emergency departments in Sweden.

RESULTS

The findings clearly illustrate the organization of emergency department triage, focusing on personnel who perform triage, as well as the facilities, resources and procedures available for triage. However, the results indicate that work associated with such triage in Sweden is not organized in any consistent matter. In 81% of the emergency departments a clerk, Licensed Practical Nurse or Registered Nurse were assigned to assess patients not arriving by ambulance. There was also diversity in other areas, including requirements for staff to have particular qualifications and clinical experience for being allocated to triage work, as well as facilities for triage personnel assessing and prioritizing patients. The use of triage scales and acuity ratings also lacked uniformity and disparities were observed in both the design and use of triage scales. A little less than half (46%) of the emergency departments did not use any kind of triage scale to document patient acuity ratings.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to several other countries, this study shows that Swedish emergency departments do not adhere well to established standards and guidelines about triage in emergency care. Research on emergency department triage, especially in the areas of personnel performing triage, triage scales and standards and guidelines are recommended.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The diversity among several aspects of nursing triage (e.g. use of less qualified personnel performing triage, the use of different triage scales) presented in the study points to a safety risk for the patients. It also shows the need of further education for the personnel in clinical practice as well as further research on triage in order to gain national consensus about this nursing task.

摘要

目的

本文报告一项研究,其目的是描述瑞典急诊科如何组织和开展与分诊相关的工作。

背景

许多发达国家的医院采用某种系统对前往急诊科的患者进行优先排序。分诊是一个常用术语,指的是对患者进行分类和确定护理优先顺序的过程。分诊程序的组织方式以及从事这类工作的人员在世界各地差异很大。在瑞典,很少有研究探讨这一重要问题。

方法

通过电话访谈对瑞典各急诊科的护士长进行了一项全国性调查。该样本代表了瑞典87%的急诊科。

结果

研究结果清楚地说明了急诊科分诊的组织情况,重点是从事分诊工作的人员,以及分诊可用的设施、资源和程序。然而,结果表明,瑞典与这种分诊相关的工作没有以任何一致的方式组织起来。在81%的急诊科,安排了一名办事员、执业护士或注册护士对非救护车送来的患者进行评估。其他方面也存在差异,包括对被分配从事分诊工作的人员的特定资质和临床经验要求,以及分诊人员评估患者和确定优先顺序的设施。分诊量表和 acuity 评级的使用也缺乏一致性,在分诊量表的设计和使用方面都存在差异。略少于一半(46%)的急诊科没有使用任何类型的分诊量表来记录患者的 acuity 评级。

结论

与其他几个国家不同,本研究表明瑞典急诊科没有很好地遵守急诊护理中关于分诊的既定标准和指南。建议对急诊科分诊进行研究,特别是在从事分诊工作的人员、分诊量表以及标准和指南等领域。

与临床实践的相关性

该研究中护理分诊几个方面的多样性(例如使用资质较低的人员进行分诊、使用不同的分诊量表)表明对患者存在安全风险。这也表明临床实践中的人员需要进一步教育,以及对分诊进行进一步研究,以便就这项护理任务达成全国共识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验