Leslie William D, Adler Robert A, El-Hajj Fuleihan Ghada, Hodsman Anthony B, Kendler David L, McClung Michael, Miller Paul D, Watts Nelson B
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, and McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
J Clin Densitom. 2006 Jan-Mar;9(1):22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 May 12.
In 2003, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) developed Official Positions regarding the applicability of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of bone mineral density to populations other than postmenopausal women. However, these prior Official Positions do not fully address bone mineral density reporting in females prior to menopause, men, and non-whites. During the 2005 ISCD Position Development Conference, members of the ISCD Expert Panel in conjunction with the ISCD Scientific Advisory Committee re-addressed these topics and, based upon stringent reviews of best available data, developed ISCD Official Positions that provide greater specificity and clarification with respect to the following: (1) the utility of the term 'osteopenia'; (2) utilization of T- and Z-scores for bone mineral density reporting; (3) when to apply the WHO densitometric classification; and (4) which normative database(s) should be used for non-white individuals. Briefly, the term "osteopenia" is retained, but 'low bone mass' or 'low bone density' is preferred. Z-scores, not T-scores, are preferred in females prior to menopause and males under age 50. In these individuals, a Z-score of -2.0 or lower is defined as "below the expected range for age" and a Z-score above -2.0 is "within the expected range for age." T-scores are preferred and the WHO classification is applicable for postmenopausal women and men age 50 and older. These Official Positions, rationale and evidence are discussed in the following report.
2003年,国际临床骨密度测量学会(ISCD)针对世界卫生组织(WHO)骨矿物质密度分类在绝经后女性以外人群中的适用性制定了官方立场。然而,这些先前的官方立场并未充分涉及绝经前女性、男性以及非白人的骨矿物质密度报告问题。在2005年ISCD立场制定会议期间,ISCD专家小组的成员与ISCD科学咨询委员会重新探讨了这些话题,并基于对现有最佳数据的严格审查,制定了ISCD官方立场,在以下方面提供了更高的特异性和清晰度:(1)“骨质减少”一词的效用;(2)骨矿物质密度报告中T值和Z值的使用;(3)何时应用WHO骨密度分类;(4)非白人个体应使用哪个标准化数据库。简而言之,“骨质减少”一词得以保留,但更倾向使用“低骨量”或“低骨密度”。绝经前女性和50岁以下男性更倾向使用Z值而非T值。在这些个体中,Z值小于或等于 -2.0被定义为“低于年龄预期范围”,Z值大于 -2.0则为“在年龄预期范围内”。绝经后女性和50岁及以上男性更倾向使用T值,且适用WHO分类。以下报告将讨论这些官方立场、基本原理和证据。