Króliczak Grzegorz, Westwood David A, Goodale Melvyn A
Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, CIHR Group on Action and Perception, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, N6A 5C2.
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Oct;175(1):139-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0524-5. Epub 2006 May 30.
In the three experiments reported here, we systematically investigated when and/or how prior semantic information about a target-object would affect the programming and execution of grasping movements. A name-length association was first created during a practice phase while participants performed one of the three tasks: grasping, naming, or manual estimation of an object's length upon an auditory presentation of its name. In the subsequent test phase, in the majority of trials, these names correctly indicated the upcoming object for a grasping task or a control naming task (Experiment 1A and 1B), and a grasping task or a manual estimation of object length (Experiment 2). In both experiments, a name was occasionally incongruent or a neutral cue (a burst of white noise) was presented instead. Although in the grasping task, semantic cues (both congruent and incongruent) consistently facilitated movement-onset time (indicating a preparatory-set like effect), the impact of these cues on the formation of grasping aperture was less consistent or absent. The experiments also demonstrated that naming and perceptual estimation of object length were affected differently from grasping by the same semantic cues, with the congruent cues facilitating and the incongruent cues slowing down response onset. These findings reinforce and extend the proposal that the transformations of visual and semantic information for perceptually-driven tasks are quite different from the transformations of the same information for the programming and control of object-directed action.
在本文所报告的三项实验中,我们系统地研究了关于目标物体的先前语义信息何时和/或如何影响抓握动作的编程和执行。在一个练习阶段首先建立了名称长度关联,在此期间参与者执行三项任务之一:抓握、命名或在听到物体名称后手动估计其长度。在随后的测试阶段,在大多数试验中,这些名称正确地指示了即将进行抓握任务或对照命名任务(实验1A和1B)以及抓握任务或手动估计物体长度(实验2)的物体。在这两个实验中,偶尔会出现名称不一致的情况,或者会呈现一个中性提示(一阵白噪声)。虽然在抓握任务中,语义提示(一致的和不一致的)始终促进动作起始时间(表明一种类似准备集的效应),但这些提示对抓握孔径形成的影响不太一致或不存在。实验还表明相同的语义提示对物体长度命名和感知估计的影响与对抓握的影响不同,一致的提示促进反应起始,不一致的提示则减缓反应起始。这些发现强化并扩展了以下观点,即视觉和语义信息在感知驱动任务中的转换与在物体导向动作的编程和控制中相同信息的转换有很大不同。