Phillips M A, Mills A J
Health Economics and Financing Programme, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
J Trop Med Hyg. 1991 Apr;94(2):130-9.
Little attention has been paid to the cost implications of different insecticides for malaria control, particularly to the local (non-insecticide) costs. This study in Nepal explored the significance of operational costs in relation to insecticide cost and examined the extent to which operational costs varied for DDT, malathion and Ficam. A detailed analysis was done of costs relating to spraying, transport and safety. The study found that the operational cost differences were relatively small in comparison with the costs of the chemicals themselves and the cost of transporting them to Nepal, though DDT and Ficam had significantly lower operational costs than malathion. Operational costs were paid mainly by the Nepalese government and insecticide and external freight costs by donors.
对于不同杀虫剂用于疟疾防治的成本影响，尤其是当地（非杀虫剂）成本，人们关注甚少。尼泊尔的这项研究探讨了运营成本与杀虫剂成本的关系，并考察了滴滴涕、马拉硫磷和氟虫腈的运营成本差异程度。对喷雾、运输和安全相关成本进行了详细分析。研究发现，与化学品本身的成本以及将其运往尼泊尔的成本相比，运营成本差异相对较小，不过滴滴涕和氟虫腈的运营成本明显低于马拉硫磷。运营成本主要由尼泊尔政府支付，杀虫剂和外部运费由捐助者支付。
