• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯里兰卡疟疾防治的成本。

Cost of malaria control in Sri Lanka.

作者信息

Konradsen F, Steele P, Perera D, van der Hoek W, Amerasinghe P H, Amerasinghe F P

机构信息

International Irrigation Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(4):301-9.

PMID:10327708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2557654/
Abstract

The study provides estimates of the cost of various malaria control measures in an area of North-Central Province of Sri Lanka where the disease is endemic. We assumed that each measure was equally effective. In these terms, impregnating privately purchased bednets with insecticide was estimated to cost Rs 48 (US(40.87) per individual protected per year, less than half the cost of spraying houses with residual insecticides. Larviciding of vector breeding sites and especially the elimination of breeding habitats by flushing streams through seasonal release of water from upstream reservoirs was estimated to be cheaper than other preventive measures (Rs 27 (US$ 0.49) and Rs 13 (US$ 0.24) per individual protected, respectively). Inclusion of both operational and capital costs of treatment indicates that the most cost-effective intervention for the government was a centrally located hospital with a relatively large catchment area (Rs 71 (US$ 1.29) per malaria case treated). Mobile clinics (Rs 153 (US$ 2.78) per malaria case treated) and a village treatment centre (Rs 112 (US$ 2.04)) per malaria case treated) were more expensive options for the government, but were considerably cheaper for households than the traditional hospital facilities. This information can guide health planners and government decision-makers in choosing the most appropriate combination of curative and preventive measures to control malaria. However, the option that is cheapest for the government may not be so for the householders, and further studies are needed to estimate the effectiveness of the various preventive measures.

摘要

该研究估算了斯里兰卡中北部省某疟疾流行地区各种疟疾控制措施的成本。我们假定每种措施的效果相同。据此估算,用杀虫剂浸渍私人购买的蚊帐,每人每年的成本为48卢比(0.4087美元),不到用残留杀虫剂喷洒房屋成本的一半。对病媒滋生地进行杀幼虫处理,特别是通过季节性从上游水库放水冲刷溪流来消除滋生地,估计比其他预防措施成本更低(每人每年分别为27卢比(0.49美元)和13卢比(0.24美元))。纳入治疗的运营成本和资本成本表明,对政府而言,最具成本效益的干预措施是一家位于中心位置、集水区相对较大的医院(每治疗一例疟疾病例成本为71卢比(1.29美元))。流动诊所(每治疗一例疟疾病例成本为153卢比(2.78美元))和乡村治疗中心(每治疗一例疟疾病例成本为112卢比(2.04美元))对政府来说成本更高,但对家庭来说比传统医院设施便宜得多。这些信息可指导卫生规划者和政府决策者选择控制疟疾的治疗和预防措施的最合适组合。然而,对政府来说最便宜的选择对家庭来说可能并非如此,还需要进一步研究来估算各种预防措施的效果。

相似文献

1
Cost of malaria control in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡疟疾防治的成本。
Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(4):301-9.
2
Cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions when malaria mortality is low: insecticide-treated nets versus in-house residual spraying in India.疟疾死亡率较低时疟疾控制干预措施的成本效益:印度的长效驱虫蚊帐与室内滞留喷洒比较
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Aug;59(3):525-39. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.005.
3
[Current malaria situation in Turkmenistan].[土库曼斯坦当前的疟疾形势]
Med Parazitol (Mosk). 2001 Jan-Mar(1):37-9.
4
[Current malaria situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan].[哈萨克斯坦共和国当前的疟疾形势]
Med Parazitol (Mosk). 2001 Jan-Mar(1):24-33.
5
Cost of malaria control in China: Henan's consolidation programme from community and government perspectives.中国疟疾防控成本:从社区和政府视角看河南的巩固项目
Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(8):653-9. Epub 2002 Aug 27.
6
Comparison of three larviciding options for malaria vector control.三种用于疟疾媒介控制的杀幼虫方法的比较。
East Mediterr Health J. 2003 Jul;9(4):627-36.
7
Conquering the intolerable burden of malaria: what's new, what's needed: a summary.战胜疟疾的沉重负担:新进展与需求总结
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Aug;71(2 Suppl):1-15.
8
Cost of health services provided at a primary health centre.初级保健中心提供的医疗服务成本。
Natl Med J India. 1995 Jul-Aug;8(4):156-61.
9
Social marketing of insecticide-treated bednets: the case for Pakistan.经杀虫剂处理蚊帐的社会营销:以巴基斯坦为例。
East Mediterr Health J. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):449-56.
10
Cost analysis of a primary health centre in northern India.印度北部一家初级卫生中心的成本分析。
Natl Med J India. 1993 Jul-Aug;6(4):160-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost effectiveness of malaria vector control activities in Sudan.苏丹疟疾媒介控制活动的成本效益。
Malar J. 2024 Mar 15;23(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-04900-7.
2
Larviciding to prevent malaria transmission.杀灭幼虫以预防疟疾传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 14;8(8):CD012736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012736.pub2.
3
The economics of malaria control and elimination: a systematic review.疟疾控制与消除的经济学:一项系统综述
Malar J. 2016 Dec 12;15(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1635-5.
4
Cost Effectiveness of Malaria Interventions from Preelimination through Elimination: a Study in Iran.从疟疾消除前期到消除阶段疟疾干预措施的成本效益:伊朗的一项研究
J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2013 Dec 18;8(1):43-52. eCollection 2014.
5
Malaria control and elimination in Sri Lanka: documenting progress and success factors in a conflict setting.斯里兰卡的疟疾控制和消除:在冲突环境中记录进展和成功因素。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043162. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
6
Application of the malaria management model to the analysis of costs and benefits of DDT versus non-DDT malaria control.将疟疾管理模型应用于滴滴涕与非滴滴涕疟疾控制的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027771. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
7
Economic evaluation of environmental health interventions to support decision making.支持决策的环境卫生干预措施的经济评估。
Environ Health Insights. 2008 Dec 19;2:137-55. doi: 10.4137/ehi.s1152.