Perrizo Karla, Pustilnik Stephen
University of Texas Medical Branch, Texas, USA.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2006 Jun;27(2):169-72. doi: 10.1097/01.paf.0000221066.52555.3b.
Our retrospective case review from 1978-2002, of infant deaths autopsied under the auspices of the Galveston County Medical Examiner Office, demonstrated a lack of detailed scene investigation, including sleeping circumstances and arrangements, as well as a pattern of ascribing the cause of death to SIDS even when there is evidence of a hazardous sleeping arrangement. During this period, 89/103 pediatric deaths were certified as SIDS and 39/103 of these were co-sleeping, 51/103 were sleeping alone, and 17/103 had no sleeping arrangement indicated. Upon review, there were only 6 cases where the scene visitation was documented. Only 9 cases used an Infant Death Investigation Form (IDIF), and this only started in 1999. The IDIF contains questions regarding the infants' sleep environment (bedding descriptions, co-sleeping, sleep surface) not used in the standard medical examiner death investigative forms. There has been an upward trend since the late 1990s in the number of scenes visited and detailed descriptions of the scenes, likely due to the increased awareness of hazardous infant sleeping conditions identified by American Academy of Pediatrics and U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. The association between co-sleeping and sudden infant death remains controversial among clinicians. We report a high association between these two conditions.
我们对1978年至2002年间在加尔维斯顿县法医办公室主持下进行尸检的婴儿死亡病例进行的回顾显示,缺乏详细的现场调查,包括睡眠情况和安排,而且即使有证据表明存在危险的睡眠安排,仍存在将死因归为婴儿猝死综合征的模式。在此期间,103例儿科死亡中有89例被认证为婴儿猝死综合征,其中39例是同床睡眠,51例独自睡眠,17例未表明睡眠安排。经审查,只有6例记录了现场勘查情况。只有9例使用了婴儿死亡调查表(IDIF),且这一做法始于1999年。婴儿死亡调查表包含一些关于婴儿睡眠环境(床上用品描述、同床睡眠、睡眠表面)的问题,这些问题在标准的法医死亡调查表格中并未使用。自20世纪90年代末以来,勘查现场数量及对现场的详细描述呈上升趋势,这可能是由于美国儿科学会和美国消费品安全委员会对危险婴儿睡眠状况的认识有所提高。同床睡眠与婴儿猝死之间的关联在临床医生中仍存在争议。我们报告了这两种情况之间的高度关联。