Staricoff Rosalia Lelchuk
J R Soc Promot Health. 2006 May;126(3):116-20. doi: 10.1177/1466424006064300.
This article aims to discuss a number of different approaches to the evaluation of the value of implementing arts projects and arts programmes, presenting the evidence of their impact when implemented either in community settings or within a healthcare environment. It focuses on the evidence provided by quantitative research and also discusses the merits of applying qualitative research, outlining their different approach of collecting, interpreting and analysing the data. A brief consideration is also given to the arguments underpinning the introduction of humanities and arts in medical and nursing education and training, an approach that promotes personal development and, most importantly, encourages the health practitioner to become more humane, understanding and sympathetic in their everyday practice. It also renders them more amenable to the introduction of art in the healthcare environment. The article concludes that the value of evaluating the effect of the arts in healthcare resides in providing to all involved in designing, implementation and funding, the knowledge of what, when and how to introduce different art forms to achieve the most effective results. Evaluations produce evidence of the impact of different art forms in encouraging beneficial clinical outcomes in patients, in enhancing the quality of healthcare services and in improving working conditions and job satisfaction.
本文旨在探讨评估实施艺术项目和艺术计划价值的多种不同方法,展示其在社区环境或医疗环境中实施时所产生影响的证据。它着重于定量研究提供的证据,同时也讨论应用定性研究的优点,概述其收集、解释和分析数据的不同方法。还简要考虑了在医学和护理教育与培训中引入人文与艺术的依据,这种方法促进个人发展,最重要的是,鼓励健康从业者在日常实践中更加人道、善解人意和富有同情心。这也使他们更易于接受在医疗环境中引入艺术。文章得出结论,评估艺术在医疗保健中的效果的价值在于为所有参与设计、实施和资助的人员提供关于引入何种艺术形式、何时引入以及如何引入以实现最有效结果的知识。评估产生了不同艺术形式在鼓励患者获得有益临床结果、提高医疗服务质量以及改善工作条件和工作满意度方面所产生影响的证据。