• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些因素在不孕症的临床决策中发挥作用?

Which factors play a role in clinical decision-making in subfertility?

作者信息

van der Steeg Jan W, Steures Pieternel, Eijkemans Marinus J C, Habbema J Dik F, Bossuyt Patrick M M, Hompes Peter G A, van der Veen Fulco, Mol Ben W J

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Apr;12(4):473-80. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62001-9.

DOI:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62001-9
PMID:16740221
Abstract

Sixteen vignettes of subfertile couples were constructed by varying fertility history, post-coital test, sperm motility, FSH concentration and Chlamydia antibody titre (CAT). Thirty-five gynaecologists estimated probabilities of treatment-independent pregnancy, intrauterine insemination (IUI) and IVF. Thereafter, they chose IUI, IVF or no treatment. The relative contribution of each factor to probability estimates and to subsequent treatment decisions was calculated. Duration of subfertility and maternal age were the most important contributors for gynaecologists' estimates of treatment-independent pregnancy [relative contribution (RC) 41, 26%]. Maternal age and FSH concentration were the most important contributors in the estimates for IUI (RC: 51, 25%) and for IVF (RC: 64, 31%). The decision to start IVF was mainly determined by maternal age, duration of subfertility, FSH concentration and CAT. The relative contribution of maternal age and duration of subfertility was in concordance with existing prediction models, whereas previous pregnancy and FSH concentration were under- and overestimated respectively. In conclusion, maternal age, duration of subfertility and FSH concentration are the main factors in clinical decision-making in subfertility. Gynaecologists overestimate the importance of FSH concentration, but underestimate that of a previous pregnancy, as compared with their importance reported in prediction models and guidelines.

摘要

通过改变生育史、性交后试验、精子活力、促卵泡激素(FSH)浓度和衣原体抗体滴度(CAT),构建了16个不育夫妇的病例 vignettes。35名妇科医生估计了自然受孕、宫内人工授精(IUI)和体外受精(IVF)的概率。此后,他们选择IUI、IVF或不进行治疗。计算了每个因素对概率估计和后续治疗决策的相对贡献。不育持续时间和母亲年龄是妇科医生估计自然受孕概率的最重要因素[相对贡献(RC)分别为41、26%]。母亲年龄和FSH浓度是IUI概率估计(RC:51、25%)和IVF概率估计(RC:64、31%)中最重要的因素。开始IVF治疗的决定主要由母亲年龄、不育持续时间、FSH浓度和CAT决定。母亲年龄和不育持续时间的相对贡献与现有的预测模型一致,而既往妊娠和FSH浓度分别被低估和高估。总之,母亲年龄、不育持续时间和FSH浓度是不育临床决策的主要因素。与预测模型和指南中报告的重要性相比,妇科医生高估了FSH浓度的重要性,但低估了既往妊娠的重要性。

相似文献

1
Which factors play a role in clinical decision-making in subfertility?哪些因素在不孕症的临床决策中发挥作用?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Apr;12(4):473-80. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62001-9.
2
Do clinical prediction models improve concordance of treatment decisions in reproductive medicine?临床预测模型能否提高生殖医学中治疗决策的一致性?
BJOG. 2006 Jul;113(7):825-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00992.x.
3
Can we identify subfertile couples that benefit from immediate in vitro fertilisation over intrauterine insemination?我们能否识别出相较于宫内授精,从即刻体外受精中获益的亚生育夫妇?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jul;202:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.024. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
4
Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.特发性不孕和男性不育的宫内人工授精或体外受精:一项随机试验和成本效益分析。
Lancet. 2000 Jan 1;355(9197):13-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04002-7.
5
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.不明原因的亚生育力的体外受精
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.
6
IVF or IUI as first-line treatment in unexplained subfertility: the conundrum of treatment selection markers.体外受精或宫腔内人工授精作为不明原因亚生育力的一线治疗:治疗选择标志物的难题
Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1028-1032. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex037.
7
Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?试管婴儿服务有两种不同方式——比控制性卵巢过度刺激下的宫腔内人工授精更具成本效益吗?
Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct;30(10):2331-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev193. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
8
Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization.总活动精子数对宫腔内人工授精和体外受精疗效及成本效益的影响。
Fertil Steril. 2001 Apr;75(4):661-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01783-0.
9
IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.不明原因不孕夫妇中,计划单胚胎移植的 IVF 与卵巢刺激的 IUI 比较:一项经济学分析。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.021. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
10
Intrauterine insemination with gonadotropin stimulation or in vitro fertilization for the treatment of unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial.促性腺激素刺激宫腔内人工授精或体外受精治疗不明原因不孕不育症:一项随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jun;107(6):1329-1335.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.028. Epub 2017 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility.INE 研究:预防多胎妊娠:一项比较不明原因或轻度男性不育夫妇中 IUI COH、IVF e SET 和 MNC IVF 的随机对照试验。
BMC Womens Health. 2009 Dec 18;9:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-35.