Peters Winfried S, Baskin Tobias I
Indiana University/Purdue University, Department of Biology, 2101 E Coliseum Blvd, Fort Wayne, IN 46805-1499, USA.
Plant Methods. 2006 Jun 2;2:11. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-2-11.
Roots are the classical model system to study the organization and dynamics of organ growth zones. Profiles of the velocity of root elements relative to the apex have generally been considered to be sigmoidal. However, recent high-resolution measurements have yielded bi-linear profiles, suggesting that sigmoidal profiles may be artifacts caused by insufficient spatio-temporal resolution. The decision whether an empirical velocity profile follows a sigmoidal or bi-linear distribution has consequences for the interpretation of the underlying biological processes. However, distinguishing between sigmoidal and bi-linear curves is notoriously problematic. A mathematical function that can describe both types of curve equally well would allow them to be distinguished by automated curve-fitting.
On the basis of the mathematical requirements defined, we created a composite function and tested it by fitting it to sigmoidal and bi-linear models with different noise levels (Monte-Carlo datasets) and to three experimental datasets from roots of Gypsophila elegans, Aurinia saxatilis, and Arabidopsis thaliana. Fits of the function proved robust with respect to noise and yielded statistically sound results if care was taken to identify reasonable initial coefficient values to start the automated fitting procedure. Descriptions of experimental datasets were significantly better than those provided by the Richards function, the most flexible of the classical growth equations, even in cases in which the data followed a smooth sigmoidal distribution.
Fits of the composite function introduced here provide an independent criterion for distinguishing sigmoidal and bi-linear growth profiles, but without forcing a dichotomous decision, as intermediate solutions are possible. Our function thus facilitates an unbiased, multiple-working hypothesis approach. While our discussion focusses on kinematic growth analysis, this and similar tailor-made functions will be useful tools wherever models of steadily or abruptly changing dependencies between empirical parameters are to be compared.
根是研究器官生长区的组织和动态的经典模型系统。根元素相对于根尖的速度分布通常被认为是S形的。然而,最近的高分辨率测量产生了双线性分布,这表明S形分布可能是由于时空分辨率不足导致的假象。确定经验速度分布是遵循S形还是双线性分布对于解释潜在的生物学过程具有重要意义。然而,区分S形曲线和双线性曲线是出了名的困难。一个能够同样好地描述这两种类型曲线的数学函数将允许通过自动曲线拟合来区分它们。
根据所定义的数学要求,我们创建了一个复合函数,并通过将其拟合到具有不同噪声水平的S形和双线性模型(蒙特卡罗数据集)以及来自丝石竹、虎耳草和拟南芥根的三个实验数据集来对其进行测试。该函数的拟合在噪声方面表现出稳健性,并且如果注意确定合理的初始系数值以启动自动拟合程序,将产生统计学上合理的结果。即使在数据遵循平滑S形分布的情况下,对实验数据集的描述也明显优于经典生长方程中最灵活的Richards函数所提供的描述。
这里引入的复合函数的拟合提供了一个区分S形和双线性生长分布的独立标准,但不强制做出二分法决策,因为可能存在中间解。因此,我们的函数促进了一种无偏见的、多工作假设的方法。虽然我们的讨论集中在运动学生长分析上,但在比较经验参数之间稳定或突然变化的依赖关系模型时,这个以及类似的量身定制的函数将是有用的工具。